ShareThis Page

SSA baseball caps season in WPIAL 2nd round

| Monday, June 5, 2017, 11:12 p.m.

The Shady Side Academy baseball team had its season come to a close with a loss to Mt. Pleasant in the second round of the WPIAL Class 2A playoffs.

The Indians upset Avonworth in the first round and ended their season with a 7-10 overall record and 5-5 mark in section play.

“We lost to a good Mt. Pleasant team,” SSA coach Bob Grandizio Jr. said. “They made it to the finals.”

Grandizio said the Indians will be one of the top teams in WPIAL Class 2A next season.

“We graduate only one senior. Nick Tarasi (P/INF), who was our team MVP last year and this year. He will be a big loss and will play at Allegheny College next year.”

Junior outfielder Ben Kosbie was the Indians' leading hitter, and Grandizio said junior catcher Luke Keenan and freshman shortstop John Salvitti were the team's best defensive players.

He also cited sophomore pitcher/outfielder Billy Frohlich as the most improved player.

“They will be the core of a very strong team next year that will also include returning starters at third base (junior Colin Kolano), second base (sophomore Tevin Anderson), first base (sophomore Michael George), designated hitter (sophomore Heath Newman) and right field (sophomore Brendan McLaughlin).

“We had a lot of good moments this year. The high point of the season were our walk-off win against Burrell and our playoff victory against Avonworth.”

Marty Stewart is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.