Share This Page

WPIAL baseball, softball rankings

| Saturday, May 12, 2012, 3:54 p.m.

BASEBALL

CLASS AAAA

Record Pvs.

1. Norwin 17-0 1

2. Bethel Park 18-2 2

3. Seneca Valley 15-4 4

4. Hempfield 15-5 3

5. Upper St. Clair 14-4 NR

Dropped out: 5. Plum (14-5)

CLASS AAA

1. Blackhawk 18-2 1

2. Hopewell 17-3 3

3. Mars 15-4 2

4. Greensburg Salem 14-4-1 5

5. Thomas Jefferson 14-4 NR

Dropped out: 4. South Park (15-5)

CLASS AA

1. Shady Side Academy 15-2 2

2. Ellwood City 18-2 3

3. Riverside 15-5 1

4. Laurel 15-5 4

5. South Fayette 13-6 NR

Dropped out: 5. Freeport (12-6)

Class A

1. Neshannock 18-2 1

2. California 17-0 2

3. Bentworth 16-1 3

4. OLSH 14-5 5

5. Serra 12-5 4

SOFTBALL

Class AAAA

Record Pvs.

1. Shaler 18-2 1

2. Franklin Regional 17-2 2

3. Hempfield 16-4 5

4. Norwin 15-3 4

5. Peters Township 14-4 NR

Dropped out: 3. North Allegheny (13-6)

Class AAA

1. Ambridge 16-2 1

2. Greensburg Salem 13-2 2

3. Belle Vernon 15-5 3

4. Montour 13-5 5

5. McGuffey 14-5 4

Class AA

1. Neshannock 18-0 1

2. Deer Lakes 15-1 2

3. Burgettstown 16-2 3

4. Riverside 14-2 4

5. Seton-La Salle 14-1 5

Class A

1. Chartiers-Houston 19-1 1

2. Sto-Rox 17-0 2

3. Carmichaels 19-1 3

4. Jefferson-Morgan 15-3 5

5. South Side Beaver 16-3 NR

Dropped out: 4. Vincentian Academy (11-5)

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.