Greensburg Salem plays mistake free in first-round win
By Chris Harlan
Published: Tuesday, May 15, 2012, 9:38 p.m.
Greensburg Salem pitcher Mike Nowicki had practiced this exact catch plenty of times before, his catcher joked.
Dive toward home, catch a bunt an inch or so above the grass, double the runner off first and make it all look routine.
“I just sit back there at practice and lob it up, and he runs and dives and throws to first without even looking,” catcher John Szmed said with a laugh after Tuesday's 5-3 victory over South Park in the first round of the WPIAL Class AAA baseball playoffs.
Nowicki's diving catch highlighted a nearly mistake-free defensive effort by Greensburg Salem, which couldn't rely only on its bats. The usually high-scoring Lions had only one hit through five innings, but they kept it close until they broke through with four runs in the sixth.
“Defense wins games,” Nowicki said.
In contrast, South Park made four errors, was a split-second late on a couple close calls and twice failed to record makeable outs at home.
“When you don't field the ball, you're not going to win,” South Park coach Steve Bucci said, “especially a playoff game.”
No. 6 seed Greensburg Salem (15-4) will face No. 3 Hopewell at 4:30 p.m., today in a quarterfinal at Burkett Field in Robinson. No. 11 South Park (15-6) was making its first postseason appearance since 2006, and that postseason inexperience could have been a factor, Bucci said.
The miscues hurt South Park in the bottom of the sixth, when Greensburg Salem batted around, had four hits and erased a 2-1 Eagles lead. It started when Sam Morris singled and scored the tying run, helped along by a throwing error.
After Szmed and Max Ponzurick singled, and Sam Mattei walked to load the bases, Greg Neumann hit a one-out grounder to shortstop. South Park's Anthony Monaco charged and threw home, but catcher Justin Dilla couldn't grab the throw, allowing Szmed and Ponzurick to score. The Lions added a sixth run when Craig Walor singled.
“We usually start out much better than we did,” Szmed said, “but we came back with fire.”
South Park's Nick Yobbi allowed just one hit during his first five innings, before giving up those four in the sixth. He allowed one run in the second, when Ponzurick singled, moved to third on a fielding error and scored on Neumann's sacrifice fly to right. He allowed one intentional walk and struck out seven.
Nowicki retired 11 of the first 12 batters he faced. South Park scored two in the sixth, including a game-tying triple by Yobbi, and added one in the seventh. But with South Park runners on second and third, Nowicki got Monaco to line out.
Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com .
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.