ShareThis Page

Greensburg Salem baseball trying to replace nine graduates

| Thursday, March 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Greensburg Salem High School's Max Ponzurick (17) warms up before a game with Uniontown High School on May 9, 2012.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Mt. Pleasant's Sean Bradley attempts to put a tag on Greensburg Salem's Max Ponzurick as he slides safely into third base during a game at Greensburg Salem on Monday, April 30, 2012.

A year ago, long-time Greensburg Salem baseball coach Jim Stewart was heading into the season with an experienced, deep team. Expectations were high.

The Lions, with nine seniors, rolled to an 11-3 finish in Section 2-AAA and a 15-5-1 overall record before dropping a heart-breaking 2-1 decision to Hopewell in the WPIAL quarterfinals.

This season, however, things are a bit different — and slightly unclear. Stewart's expectations haven't changed for his successful program, but Greensburg Salem is starting things off with new faces and new starters on the varsity team.

“This is a relatively new team,” Stewart said. “We lost a lot of really good ballplayers. But we also have some coming back and some ready to step up to take those spots.”

Stewart will turn to three players to take leadership roles and anchor the team. All played key roles as sophomores and are game-tested.

Juniors Greg Neumann, Max Ponzurick and Patrick Boyer are expected to help the Lions make a clean, quick transition. Neumann and Ponzurick are expected to make position changes from last season to help make use of the team's strengths.

Neumann, who played in the outfield as a sophomore, will shift to catcher. He also will be counted on to be one of the top bats for the Lions this spring after hitting .444 last season with 19 RBI.

“He really stepped up last season,” Stewart said. “He's worked hard over the offseason and should continue to improve this season.”

Boyer, an imposing pitcher at 6-foot-5 who pitched in the team's playoff loss last season against Hopewell, should anchor the staff and also get time at third base.

“He pitched a great game for us in the playoff loss,” Stewart said. “It was very impressive for an underclassman in that spot. He really pitched great. He's very imposing with his size. Out on the mound, he looks like he's about 6-foot-8. He's got huge hands and hides the ball well. He has a good confidence level and nice mix of pitches. I'm expecting him to have a strong season.”

Ponzurick, who played third base last season, will shift to shortstop. He was one of the Lions' top offensive weapons a year ago, hitting .472 with two home runs and more than 20 RBI. He also will help with the pitching duties.

“Max had a very successful season,” Stewart said. “He's a great hitter and all-around player.”

Having a young but relatively deep pitching staff should help the Lions as the weather gets warmer and teams are forced to play several games a week because of early season postponements.

Stewart is confident his team can be successful in an always-challenging section.

“Top to bottom, this will again be a very competitive league,” he said. “I'm expecting Mt. Pleasant to be very good. Elizabeth Forward is always good. Laurel Highlands is back with us and Indiana has a strong program year in and year out. There are a number of teams that will be strong. We're going to have our hands full.”

The Lions should learn a lot about their new-look team quickly. Greensburg Salem put together a grueling nonsection schedule that includes rivals Greensburg Central Catholic, Hempfield, Belle Vernon and Connellsville, in addition to non-WPIAL members Ligonier Valley and The Kiski School.

Brian Hunger is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.