Elizabeth Forward self destructs in setback
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Wylie Field isn't what you would call a field of dreams.
While the fans crawling through a hole along the third-base line fence to gain access to the bleachers to the basketball/tennis courts doubling as the batter's eye to a railroad blowing its whistle only feet behind the home team's dugout may be charming, but it is also distracting to opponents
That's something South Park coach Steve Bucci was aware of when his team traveled to Wylie Field to put its 9-0 record on the line against Elizabeth Forward in a Section 4-AAA game.
“I did some research beforehand,” Bucci said, “and they are a tough team to play here.”
Well, you sure couldn't tell that Elizabeth Forward was 28-2 over its past 30 games at Wylie Field by what transpired against the Eagles.
South Park (10-0, 3-0) banged out 13 hits and hit double-figure runs for the 10th time this year with a convincing 13-0 win over Elizabeth Forward (7-2, 1-2).
“Them being 28-2 was a stat that we knew coming in here,” Bucci said. “This is a tough place to play with a lot of open space and the background for hitters.”
It didn't seem to bother Nick Yobbi, and it sure didn't hurt South Park's bats.
Yobbi improved to 3-0 as he tossed six innings of scoreless ball while scattering six singles and striking out six to raise his season total to 26.
“Obviously it was a painful section loss,” Elizabeth Forward coach Frank Champ said.
“It was ugly, and it could've been worse, for sure.”
For the second consecutive game, Elizabeth Forward struggled with what Champ referred to as routine plays.
Add that to eight walks and two hit batters by three pitchers against one of the best teams in Class AAA, and you get a second consecutive section blowout loss.
“I said it on Monday after West Mifflin's loss, and I'll say it again, we need to make the routine plays,” Champ said. “Yobbi is very good — very good. You can't give him anything let alone do what we did.”
EF made three errors but wasn't able to make a handful of other plays that allowed innings to continue.
South Park took advantage.
Jake Bywalski (two doubles, RBI), Greg Pantuso (single, double, RBI, three runs), Carter Grote (two hits, RBI), Cris Winkler (two hits, RBI), Randy Dobnak (single, double, three RBI) and Justin Dilla (two hits, three RBI) led the Eagles' offensive barrage.
“It seemed like we had their pitcher on the ropes nearly every inning,” Bucci said. “We feel like our top nine can match up with anybody's top nine.”
Elizabeth Forward didn't give losing pitcher Luke Padezan much help other than a pair of hits each from Jake Terrick and Ryan Wardropper.
“South Park is a talented group who can hit the ball, and Nick Yobbi doesn't need much help,” Champ said.
Yobbi worked out of a jam in the first inning when he gave up hits to two of the first three batters before settling down. If it wasn't for a third-inning walk, Yobbi would've retired 15 in a row.
South Park gave Yobbi all he needed with a bases loaded double by Adam Thompson in the second that scored a pair followed by a groundout by Pantuso to make it 3-0.
South Park added two more in the fourth and then put the game away with eight runs over the final two innings.
“This score didn't indicate what kind of team they are,” Bucci said. “We played well in every facet of the game, and I am hoping that continues.”
South Park hosts West Mifflin on Friday night at Evans Field (7 p.m.) for sole possession of first place.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.