Daily News roundup: West Mifflin comes up short against South Park
West Mifflin scored more runs against South Park than any other WPIAL team so far this season, but the Titans' fate was just like all the others as the Eagles remained undefeated with a 10-6 Section 4 victory.
Thomas Jefferson and Franklin Regional had each scored four runs in losses to South Park (11-0, 4-0), which is one of only two undefeated baseball teams — Hopewell being the other — in Class AAA.
Randy Dobnak pitched six innings for the Eagles and allowed two runs while striking out two and walking two. Greg Pantuso had two doubles as part of his three-hit day to lead the South Park offense.
A.J. Olasz homered for West Mifflin, which hosted after the game.
Woodland Hills 4, Allderdice 1 — Jake Jessel allowed his only hit of the game in the seventh and he struck out 12 to lead the Wolverines to just their second win of the season.
Steel Valley 18, East Allegheny 0 (3 inn.) — Maddie Cotter allowed one hit and walked one in three innings of work as the Ironmen rolled over the winless Wildcats.
Skyler Vinnay helped Steel Valley (2-2, 2-2) as she went 3 for 4 with two doubles and three RBI, while Chelsea Rohan had three hits, including a triple, and drove in four. The Ironmen scored 15 runs in the top of the third inning.
Jefferson-Morgan 7, Serra Catholic 3 — The Eagles were bitten by an opponent's fast start for the second time in a week as the Rockets scored three runs in the top of the first off Serra Catholic freshman starter Sam Andrekanic.
Serra Catholic (6-3, 5-3) also gave up four runs in the first inning in a road loss to Frazier on Tuesday.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.