ShareThis Page

Norwin holds off late Connellsville charge to remain in playoff position

| Thursday, April 25, 2013, 11:03 p.m.
Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier
Connellsville's Michael Parlak makes contact in the third inning of Connellsville's matchup against Norwin held Thursday, April 25, 2013, at Connellsville Area High School.
Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier
Connellsville shortstop Cameron Bernhardt (front) makes a throw to first base as Norwin's Dylan Sabo slides safely into second in the third inning of Connellsville's match up against Norwin Thursday, April 25, 2013, at Connellsville Area High School.
Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier
Connellsville's Michael Parlak (left) tags out Norwin's Cody Sharik during the second inning of a Section 2-AAAA game Thursday, April 25, 2013, at Connellsville.
Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier
Norwin's Jake Pribanic crosses home plate in the third inning of Norwin's matchup against Connellsville Thursday, April 25, 2013, at Connellsville Area High School.

Thursday's baseball game between Norwin and host Connellsville had plenty on the line — only one game separates the teams in the Section 2-AAAA standings.

The Knights (6-5, 5-3) built a 5-0 lead, then survived a last-inning Connellsville rally to hold on for a 5-4 win to remain tied with Latrobe for the third and final playoff spot in the section.

For the Falcons (5-5, 3-5), the loss seriously damages their hopes of qualifying for the postseason.

“We didn't play as well as we would have liked,” Norwin coach Mike Liebdzinski said. “But a win is a win, and I'll take it.”

The Knights took advantage of some early Connellsville errors. In the first inning, J.J. Matijevic doubled and scored on an error. Then in the third, an error on a ground ball opened the door for a three-run inning, as Matijevic singled in a run before Cody Stanoszek singled to knock in a pair, making it 4-0. Norwin's first four runs were unearned against Connellsville starter Ryan Huey, who was tagged with the loss.

“We gave them a bit of a head start,” Connellsville coach Rob Orndorff said. “That makes it tough on the pitcher, but I thought Ryan Huey did a good job. He did a nice job of controlling their running game, but we gave them a run here and some runs there, and we had to play catch-up.”

Playing catch-up proved to be a tall order against Norwin starter Noah Smith. The right-hander pitched six strong innings and gave up just one unearned run on three hits. He struck out eight and walked three.

“I don't think he had his best stuff, but he did a nice job,” Liebdzinski said.

Smith helped himself with the bat as he singled in a run in the sixth to make it 5-0. Connellsville got that run back in the bottom of the inning as J.T. Stevenson drove in a run with a sacrifice fly to make it 5-1.

The game stayed that way until the bottom of the seventh. Smith was lifted after throwing 100 pitches, and the Falcons were able to get some offense going against reliever Matijevic.

After Grant Witt walked, pinch-hitter Ty Henry singled before Brock Bonadio walked. Evan Onusko singled in a pair of runs to make it 5-3 before Cameron Bernhardt was hit by a pitch to load the bases with nobody out.

Matijevic was replaced by Kevin Kuhn, and Kuhn delivered.

The Falcons pulled to within a run, but it came when Norwin turned a double play. And with the tying run at third base, Kuhn got a game-ending ground out to secure the save and preserve the win for Smith.

“Kevin Kuhn came on in a real tough spot, and the defense made the plays behind him and we were able to get out of it,” Liebdzinski said.

For the Falcons, it was a nice rally, but it wasn't enough.

“The kids didn't sit back,” Orndorff said. “We played seven innings, and we didn't quit. We battled, but we came up short.”

Jason Black is the Local Sports Editor of the Daily Courier. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.