ShareThis Page

Big innings helps Freeport baseball team outlast Ford City

| Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 12:06 a.m.
Matt Grubba | Leader Times
Freeport shortstop Robbie Miller makes an off-balance throw during the Yellowjackets' 14-12 win over Ford City in Section 3-AA play on Monday, April 22, 2013, at Ford City. Miller was 2 for 4 with two runs scored in the game, and he pitched the final two outs to earn the save.
Matt Grubba | Leader Times
Freeport pitcher Luke Mariotti delivers after coming on in relief during his team's 14-12 win over Ford City in Section 3-AA play on Monday, April 22, 2013, at Ford City. Mariotti picked up the win after taking the hill in the top of the third and pitching four innings.

After his team gave up five runs in the first inning, Freeport coach Chris Graczyk urged on his players by saying: “We need an inning.”

There's no way Graczyk could have predicted the inning he got in response.

Freeport sent 15 players to the plate, and 11 scored in the top of the second as the Yellowjackets took control of the game and sole possession of second place in Section 3-AA with a 14-12 win at Ford City.

Levi Negley, Matt Swartz and Dustin Koedel each had two-run hits in the second for Freeport (7-2, 5-2), and Ethan McCormick, Robbie Miller and Luke Mariotti each drove in a run during an inning extended by four Ford City errors.

“I was kind of hoping to get one or two runs to chip away at the lead, but our guys responded with 11,” Graczyk said. “If you're going to respond, that's the way to do it. They made a statement there.”

While Freeport did its part with seven hits in the inning, Ford City (4-4, 4-3) couldn't help starting pitcher Brandon Dineley. He allowed 11 runs in 1 23 innings, but six of them were unearned after miscues by the Sabers' defense.

“Our defense was the whole story,” Ford City coach Dennis Montgomery said. “If you'd have told me we were going to get 12 runs, I definitely thought we could have held them to less than that.

“We gave them seven outs in an inning. After missing a routine double-play ball, they scored 10 runs. We could've come off the field winning, 5-1, instead we're losing, 11-5, after missing three fly balls. We gave it away.”

The game was a stark contrast from the teams' first meeting, a 2-1 win by Ford City on April 4.

Ford City worked its way back into the game after a three-run third inning and a two-run single from Dave Lattanzio that cut the lead to 12-10 in the sixth.

Freeport added two runs in the top of the seventh on an RBI single by Negley and an RBI walk drawn by Josh Beale, and it would need both when Ford City loaded the bases with no outs in the bottom half.

Dineley singled with one out to drive in a run, and Ashton McGinnis grounded into a fielder's choice at second to bring home a second run. Freeport relief pitcher Miller then walked Noah Nulph before striking out Aaron Shaner to end the game.

Miller recorded the final two outs for the save, and Mariotti pitched four innings in relief of McCormick to earn the win for Freeport.

“We lost a little focus through the middle innings,” Graczyk said. “Give (Ford City) credit. They got a run here and a run there, and we didn't take advantage of our guys on base.

“We needed to get a split with them, as far as the standings go, and we got it. A win is a win at this point of the season.”

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.