Held hits close to .400 for Brentwood baseball team
Jake Held developed into a serious offensive threat for the Brentwood varsity baseball team in 2013.
Held, a senior first baseman, led the Spartans in hitting, with a sparkling .395 batting average; home runs, with four; and RBI, with 14.
“Jake really had a breakout year,” Greg Perdziola, Brentwood's head coach, said.
“He was our triple crown guy, leading the team in home runs, batting average and RBI.”
Held, who ranked second on the team in runs scored (10), was one of four Brentwood players who hit .300 or better this season.
Sophomore outfielder/catcher Tyler Jorgenson batted .350, followed by junior outfielder Justin Vickless, at .347, and senior pitcher/middle infielder Chris Shortley, at .311.
Vickless, who hit .320 last season, led Brentwood in runs, with 12; and doubles, with eight; to go along with eight RBI.
Shortley finished with 10 RBI and scored 10 runs.
“Justin and Chris had a very good year at the plate,” Perdziola said. “They hit the ball hard all year.”
The leading long-ball threats for the Spartans this season consisted of Held, junior catcher Derek Hogue, Shortley, Vickless and sophomore middle infielder Connor McWilliams.
Along with Held's four round trippers, Hogue and Shortley belted two apiece, while Vickless and McWillians clouted one apiece.
Brentwood finished with a 2-12 overall record and in Section 1-AA in 2013, as Vickless, a right-handed hurler, picked up both victories.
Shortley struck out 48 batters in 36 innings of work this season.
The right-handed flamethrower also fanned 48 hitters in 48 innings in 2012, and 30 in 26 innings in 2011.
Ray Fisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5820 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.