ShareThis Page

Riverview baseball team rolls into quarterfinals

| Monday, May 13, 2013, 9:57 p.m.
Riverview's Anthony Malky (right) puts the tag on Rochester's Kyle Ziegler at second base to record the out in WPIAL playoff action Monday May 13, 2013, at Fox Chapel High School.
Bill Shirley | For the Valley News Dispatch
Riverview's Anthony Malky (right) puts the tag on Rochester's Kyle Ziegler at second base to record the out in WPIAL playoff action Monday May 13, 2013, at Fox Chapel High School.

Riverview scored four runs in the fourth and fifth innings and rolled to a 9-4 victory over Rochester in the opening round of the WPIAL Class A playoffs Monday at Fox Chapel.

Junior Nick DiBucci, in his postseason debut, pitched the first four innings to earn the win, and junior Dom Conte pitched the final three to record the save.

The third-seeded Raiders (15-2) advance to the quarterfinals where they will face California on Wednesday at a site and time to be determined. The Trojans defeated Sewickley Academy on Monday.

Jason Anthony and Zach Aber drove in three runs apiece to pace Riverview.

“We had a couple good practices, and we came in here highly confident,” Raiders coach Rich Griser said. “We thought we had the preparation for this game, and other than a couple mistakes, it went well.”

The Raiders took a 1-0 lead in the second inning thanks to two Rams errors.

Riverview began to pull away in the fourth.

DiBucci helped himself with a single and took second on a balk. With Anthony Malky, who has a batting average higher than .600, at the plate, Rochester elected to walk the Akron recruit. Jake Paradise then hit a chopper off Rams pitcher Chaz Verrico's glove that caromed to the hole at short to load the bases. Anthony drew a walk to score DiBucci, and Aber drove in two more runs with a sharp single to left.

With one out, Anthony scored on a wild pitch to cap the rally.

The same four Riverview players — DiBucci, Malky, Paradise and Anthony — scored four runs in the fifth inning.

DiBucci gave up two unearned runs and scattered seven hits over four innings.

“It's definitely nerve-wracking; I'm not going to lie,” DiBucci said of his approach to the playoff game. “You get butterflies going on the bus, but you have to get focused just like any other game.”

DiBucci won't be eligible to pitch Wednesday, but Malky and Conte will be ready.

“We know to go a good ways in the playoffs, you can't do it with just one ace hurler,” Griser said. “You have to have players that can step up and pitch these games against playoff teams.”

The Rams (6-9) finally broke through against DiBucci in the fourth, scoring twice and sending eight batters to the plate.

The inning ended when Raiders first baseman Sam Gonsowski reached over the fence and into the protective netting to make a catch in foul territory, retiring Verrico.

While Riverview didn't get an extra-base hit, eight of the nine Raiders reached base.

“When you can get it all balanced like that, we don't have anybody running away with stats,” Griser said. “We have a lot of solid hitters throughout the lineup.”

It was Riverview's first Class A playoff victory since 2002 when the Raiders defeated Bishop Canevin, 6-5, in an opening-round game. Since then, Riverview has been a Class AA school and competed well, including a victory over then-No. 1 seed South Fayette in 2010.

“We know to take everybody seriously in the playoffs,” Griser said. “We thought we would be OK if we had to play in that Class AA conference this year.”

Brandon Hopkins was the offensive star for Rochester with a double and two singles, and O'Shea Anderson had three singles.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.