Keystone Oaks baseball ace shines in blowout win over Elizabeth Forward
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Keystone Oaks coach Scott Crimone is as enamored with Jared Skolnicki's gaudy statistics as much as the next guy.
Though Skolnicki's record has been perfect, his ERA miniscule and the strikeouts plenty, there's one part of his game that never fails to impress Crimone.
“Poise,” the coach said.
Elizabeth Forward coach Frank Champ won't argue.
After staying perfect through three innings, Skolnicki worked himself out of trouble in the fourth, fifth and sixth. Then, Keystone Oaks exploded for seven runs in the seventh to blow open a close game and advance to the quarterfinals of the Class AAA playoffs with a 10-0 win over Elizabeth Forward at West Mifflin.
“It is always his poise that blows us away,” Crimone said.
Keystone Oaks (16-4) will take on Section 3 foe Chartiers Valley (17-4), a 2-1 winner over Belle Vernon, on Wednesday at a time and site to be determined. The two teams split their season series.
“I tip my hat to that pitcher. He was very good,” Champ said. “He has all those wins and all those stats this year for a reason.”
Skolnicki, a Kent State recruit, improved to 8-0 and lowered his ERA to 0.29. He finished with a complete game, allowing four hits while striking out 12 on 94 pitches.
“And to be honest, he wasn't as dominating as he usually is,” Crimone said. “It's hard to believe, but it's true.”
Taylor Lehman had a double, single and four RBI, and Skolnicki, Ryan Ribeau and Nick Riggle added two hits and an RBI to lead Keystone Oaks.
Mark Adams picked up the loss for Elizabeth Forward (13-7). He was solid through six innings, allowing only a first-inning Lehman two-out, two-run double and a Lehman sacrifice fly in the sixth before the Warriors imploded in the seventh. Keystone Oaks scored seven unearned runs to make a close game a blowout.
“One or two hits here or there, and it's a different game,” Champ said.
Those hits never came mostly because Skolnicki was his best when he had to be:
• Elizabeth Forward put the first two runners on in the fourth just to have Skolnicki strike out Ryan Wardropper, get Jake Terrick out at the plate on Ryan Thornton's comebacker and force Matt Diehl to pop out to third to end the inning.
• With runners on first and third with one out in the fifth, Skolnicki struck out Justin Bakewell and Terrick to end the threat.
• With runners on first and third with one out in the sixth, Skolnicki got Diehl to bounce back to the mound and Steve Welsh to roll to first to end the inning.
“We just never got that timely hit, that hit in a crucial situation,” Champ said. “We had so many opportunities but weren't able to come up with that hit. We had the meat of the order coming up, and if we got anything there — even a fly ball — and it might've swung a little momentum our way.”
Instead, the momentum went to Keystone Oaks.
The Golden Eagles took advantage of two Adams errors in the seventh, sending 13 batters to plate.
Six consecutive batters — Brandon Gresh, Skolnicki, Ribeau, Lehman, Riggle, Walt Hepner — drove in runs to knock Adams out of the game.
“Give Mark credit. He settled down and pitched well after the first,” Champ said. “If we could've pushed one or two across, I probably wouldn't have left Mark out there that long, but would've/should've. I wish it was 3-2 heading into the last inning, but we didn't do it.
“It was a good season, but our goal definitely was going farther than just making the playoffs.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.