Share This Page

Hempfield beats Canon-Mac to reach semifinals for 1st time

| Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 10:45 p.m.
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
Hempfield catcher Tyler Hensler tags out Canon-McMillan's Jared Beach on a throw by right fielder Luke Fox in the fifth inning of their WPIAL Class AAAA quarterfinal playoff game Wednesday, May 15, 2013, in Wexford.

Hempfield used a strong pitching performance to win its opening round WPIAL Class AAAA playoff game on Monday.

They used a different method Wednesday in the quarterfinals.

Winning pitcher Greg Martin went 3 for 4 with three RBI, and outfielders Jeff Livengood and Luke Fox gunned down runners at the plate as Hempfield defeated Canon-McMillan, 7-3, to advance to the WPIAL semifinals for the first time in school history.

No. 3 Hempfield (19-3) will face No. 2 North Allegheny, which defeated Plum, on Tuesday at a site and time to be determined.

“I don't think they are uptight about reaching the semifinals,” Hempfield coach Tim Buzzard said. “They're excited they still have a shot at the finals.”

Martin worked the first four innings, limiting Canon-McMillan to two runs. Tyler Tubbs earned a three-inning save, limiting the Big Macs to one run. Both pitchers got clutch outs with runners in scoring position, as Canon-McMillan (12-8) stranded eight runners, including the bases loaded in the fourth inning.

Martin recorded a huge strikeout in the fourth inning when he got Canon-McMillan's leadoff hitter Frank Fortunato looking with the bases loaded.

Hempfield scored a run in every inning except the fourth and took advantage of wildness by starting pitcher John Ross. The Spartans drew six walks and five came around to score.

Ross walked five and allowed only two hits, an RBI double by Martin in the first inning and a two-run single by Martin in the third inning.

“They hit the ball well, and we knew that,” Buzzard said. “We knew we'd be in a battle, so we just limited the walks and tried to play a clean game defensively.”

Hempfield led, 2-0, after two innings before Canon-McMillan tied the score at 2-2 on Teagan Piechnick's home run and Fortunato, who had reached on a hit, scored on a hit by Jared Beach. Livengood, however, cut down a runner trying to score on Fortunato's hit.

“Our outfield is one of the best in the WPIAL,” Livengood said. “When I saw the runner rounding third, I knew I had the kid. I got him and it saved a run.”

Martin then followed in the bottom of the third with his two-run hit that gave Hempfield the lead for good at 4-2.

In the fifth inning, Fox, fielding an overthrow down the right field line, threw a strike to catcher Tyler Hensler to nail Beach trying to score the tying run.

“I was just doing my job backing up the play,” Fox said. “I knew I had a shot with a good throw. Tyler made a great play at the plate.”

Hempfield got out of trouble when Tubbs retired the next two batters to end the threat.

“Even though they scored a run, we were able to get an out,” Buzzard said. “That was a heck of a throw by Luke.”

Nathan Mori and Joey DeFloria added RBI hits in the sixth inning to give Hempfield a four-run lead.

Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at pschofield@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.