Pantuso, Gitzen provide offensive punch to Baldwin baseball's lineup
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Alex Pantuso and Jordan Gitzen provided a formidable one-two punch for the Baldwin baseball team in 2013.
Pantuso, a junior pitcher/infielder, hit a team-leading .425 this season with three home runs, five doubles and 14 RBI.
“Alex did great job this year pitching, and obviously hitting,” Dan Caponi, Baldwin's head coach, said. “He is a great team leader with an excellent work ethic.
“As hard as he works, we look for bigger and better things next year.”
Gitzen, a sophomore outfielder, finished with a .409 batting average with two home runs, three doubles and 12 RBI.
“Jordan had an unbelievable year at the plate and in the outfield,” Caponi said. “He's another hard worker with a bright future ahead of him.”
Pantuso and Gitzen were complemented offensively by freshman outfielder Chris Eisel (.333), sophomore third baseman Dylan Finocchi (.327) and junior designated hitter Tony Martinez (.270).
Martinez led the club in RBI with 15, and clouted two home runs and two doubles.
Tom McCarthy, a junior infielder, also belted a home run for the Highlanders this season.
Nick Benick, a junior pitcher/infielder, paced the pitching staff with a 3-3 record and 3.57 earned run average in 35.1 innings of work.
Pantuso and junior Zach Murray also picked up a victory apiece.
Baldwin ended up 5-12 overall this season and finished in fourth place in Section 3-AAAA with a 4-6 slate, behind Central Catholic (9-1), Franklin Regional (8-2) and Plum (7-3).
The Highlanders were edged by Connellsville, 6-5, in their season finale. Pantuso collected four hits — two singles, a double and a home run — in the game.
McKeesport (2-8) and Gateway (0-10) rounded out the section standings.
Ray Fisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5820 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.