ShareThis Page

Hempfield tries to shake off WPIAL semifinal loss

| Thursday, May 30, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Hempfield pitcher Zack Martinelli sits in the outfield after the Spartans' 3-0 loss to North Allegheny in a WPIAL Class AAAA semifinal Tuesday, May 21, 2013, at Shaler.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Hempfield pitcher Zack Martinelli sits in the outfield after the Spartans' 3-0 loss to North Allegheny in a WPIAL Class AAAA semifinal Tuesday, May 21, 2013, at Shaler.

North Allegheny just seems to have Hempfield's number on the baseball diamond.

The Spartans lost for a second time to the Tigers this season — the most recent coming in a WPIAL Class AAAA semifinal last week. North Allegheny also knocked Hempfield out of the WPIAL playoffs a year ago.

The Spartans lost both of this season's meetings by 3-0 scores.

The loss ended Hempfield's hopes of a WPIAL title, but it didn't end its season quite yet.

The Spartans were scheduled to play Pine-Richland in the third-place consolation game earlier this week, but results were unavailable prior to this edition's deadline. A win would qualify Hempfield for an invite to the PIAA playoffs for the first time.

Hempfield (19-4) edged the Rams (17-5), 4-3, during the regular season.

“It's a do or die game,” Hempfield coach Tim Buzzard said earlier this week. “We know they're a very good team and have a lot of great players. They've beat some good teams this year and are always strong.”

In the loss to North Allegheny, Hempfield was able to get players on base, but it continually did so with two outs. The Spartans were unable to get any clutch hits after getting a man on base. In all, the Spartans got on base eight times — seven of which came with two outs. Hempfield left two runners on twice.

“They were able to get guys on base early in innings,” Buzzard said. “We had some chances but didn't get it done. I think we tried to force some things and definitely had some missed opportunities. It's hard to always try and rally with two outs.”

North Allegheny put its leadoff man on base four times and each time a sacrifice bunt followed. Two eventually scored as a result of the small-ball strategy.

Pitcher Zack Martinelli, a Seton Hill recruit, had another strong outing while holding the Tigers' explosive offense to just five hits — all singles. In a first-round win against Fox Chapel, he recorded 18 strikeouts.

“Zach's just been awesome,” Buzzard said. “He threw a really good game against North Allegheny. He was cruising and didn't give up much. They found a few holes and were able to get some runs across, but to shut down a team like that is pretty impressive. He's continuing to get strong and is just really putting together a nice season.”

It was Hempfield's first loss in almost a month and ended a nine-game winning streak. Buzzard said he was impressed with his team's character and how quickly it shook off the defeat. The Spartans haven't been on the opposite end too often this season en route to one of the best seasons in school history.

“The morale is great,” he said. “It was a tough loss and the kids knew it, but they recovered quickly. We looked at some things we could have done differently and hopefully we'll be able to apply those things in the future. We practiced hard all week and will be ready to play.”

Brian Hunger is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.