Franklin Regional's McGrath named Class AAAA Player of the Year
By Doug Gulasy
Published: Tuesday, May 28, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Danny McGrath needed to take a moment to reflect when he learned he was voted the WPIAL Class AAAA Player of the Year earlier this month.
Turns out he was in the right place for it.
“I think I was actually up at the Relay For Life in Murrysville (on May 18),” McGrath said. “I was sitting on the steps, and I had to take a second to take it in once I found out.”
Class AAAA coaches voted McGrath as Player of the Year after a senior season in which he batted .533 for the Panthers (16-4), who finished in second place in Section 3-AAAA. The .533 average was the best among Class AAAA players this season.
In addition to the high batting average, McGrath finished with 23 runs batted in, 30 runs scored and 10 stolen bases as Franklin Regional's leadoff hitter.
Still, the recognition came as a surprise.
“I knew I was having a pretty good year, but I didn't know how good anybody else was doing (on) schools that we hadn't played,” he said.
McGrath was one of two local players to be honored by Class AAAA coaches, as Penn-Trafford pitcher Tyler Smith was voted Pitcher of the Year.
McGrath said he plans to play baseball this summer for the Allegheny Tigers of the Western Pennsylvania Elite Baseball League. He committed to play next season at California University of Pennsylvania, though he said some other colleges had contacted him after he won Player of the Year.
“I think I'm definitely still leaning towards Cal,” McGrath said. “They've always been there, since last year. I love the campus and love their program down there.
“I'd have to get a pretty good offer, good interest from another school, to change my mind.”
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.