ShareThis Page

PIAA championship roundup: West York repeats as Class AAA baseball champ

| Friday, June 14, 2013, 10:09 p.m.

Winning was twice as nice for members of the West York baseball team Friday as they successfully defended their PIAA Class AAA title with a 2-1 victory over Upper Moreland (21-5) at Penn State's Medlar Field at Lubrano Park.

Brandon Kinneman allowed four hits in five innings to earn the win, and Carson Fries picked up the save for the Bulldogs (21-8), who scored two runs in the second inning on a pair of singles, an error and a suicide squeeze.

Chase James had an RBI single and scored, and Brandon Rauhauser executed the squeeze for the eventual winning run for the District 3 third-place team.

North Penn 6, Lower Dauphin 5 (9 inn.) — Bobby Scott singled to left to score the winning run in the bottom of the ninth as District 1 fourth-place finisher North Penn won the PIAA Class AAAA title at Penn State's Medlar Field at Lubrano Park.

Lower Dauphin's Kaylor Kulina singled in the top of the seventh to tie the game at five and then came on in relief in the bottom of the inning with two runners on, getting two strikeouts to end the threat and send the game into extra innings.

He was dealt the loss after allowing the game-winning hit in the ninth.

North Penn, which also won the 2009 title, finished the season 17-10. District 3 champion Lower Dauphin ended 22-6-1.

Johnsonburg 5, Canton 0 — Cole Peterson threw a complete-game three-hitter with six strikeouts to improve to 10-0, as District 9 runner-up Johnsonburg (19-3) won the PIAA Class A title at Penn State's Medlar Field at Lubrano Park.

Garrett Wesneski took the loss for District 4 champ Canton (23-3), which was making its first trip to the PIAA tournament.


Valley View 5, Fort LeBoeuf 0 — The Cougars scored four runs in the first inning, and Gina Chieffallo struck out 10 batters, as Valley View (20-0) was victorious in the PIAA Class AAA championship game at Penn-State's Beard Field.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.