Quaker Valley baseball team reflects on 'special' season
TribLIVE Sports Videos
After the Quaker Valley baseball team fell to Beaver, 7-0, in the PIAA Class AA semifinals last week, coach Todd Goble had two words for his team: Thank you.
“They exceeded all expectations,” the Quakers' first-season coach said. “No one in the community thought they would go undefeated in the regular season and win the section title or make it one game from playing for a state title. This was a special group. I don't know if they understand what they accomplished.”
The Quakers finished the season with a 23-2 mark, the only losses coming to Beaver in the postseason. Along the way the team reached the playoffs for the first time since 2006 and made its first WPIAL title game since 1984.
“You can look back at the record and just think about how many teams wish they went 23-2,” Goble said. “I enjoyed every practice and being around the kids. They are great young men. Whether it was the 23 wins or the two defeats, they carried themselves with class and sportsmanship.”
Pitching was a driving force behind Quaker Valley's strong season. Sophomore Tyler Garbee picked up an 8-0 mark during the regular season. Junior Matt Delie went 4-0 during the regular season and struck out 40 batters. Senior Jake Pilewicz also went 4-0 with 39 strikeouts.
Junior Christian Miller went 2-0 and pitched four innings of scoreless relief to clinch the Section 1-AA title for the Quakers in a 8-4 win over New Brighton on May 2.
Garbee picked up three wins on the mound in the postseason as he defeated Burrell in the WPIAL playoffs and Saegertown and Shady Side Academy in the PIAA tournament
No pitcher threw more than 100 pitches in any start. The Quakers allowed an average of only 2.4 runs per game.
“Offense will come and go, but pitching and defense will keep you in games,” Goble said. “And for the most part our pitching and defense was extraordinary. I saw some unbelievable plays from kids on defense.”
The batting was also on target for Quaker Valley. Pilewicz had a .478 average in the regular season and senior Nelson Westwood hit .453. Senior Clayton Bouchard scored 25 runs during the regular season and scored a run in each of the first 17 games. He was stranded on third twice during the Quakers' 6-2 season finale win over Ambridge. Senior T.J. Kuny added 17 runs, Westwood finished with 18 and junior Ben Utterback ended with 17.
Bouchard had a .462 batting average during the WPIAL playoffs while scoring three runs and hit .625 during the PIAA run, including going 4 for 4 against Shady Side Academy. Pilewicz hit .400 throughout the postseason run, while Westwood had five RBI and two triples during the WPIAL playoffs.
While the team statistics are impressive, what may have been the secret ingredient to the Quakers' success was chemistry. The coaching staff purposely did not show the players any of the stats until after the completion of the season as they stressed the team first-concept.
“The chemistry really grew throughout the season,” Bouchard said. “In the playoffs it reached its highest point. It was big in keeping our spirits up.”
It was a fitting end for the careers of the team's seven seniors. While their first three seasons all ended on a sour note, the 2013 season made up for it as they led the team to one of the greatest seasons in program history.
“This senior class is best friends,” Bouchard said. “There are so many little stories from all the games and practices and bus rides. Making the undefeated run then through WPIALs into states is something I will always be able to look back and remember.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.