Brendan McKay has hopes of hearing his name called at next year's Major League Baseball first-year player draft, but the rising senior pitcher at Blackhawk made sure he has a backup plan in place.
The talented left-hander made a verbal commitment to Louisville over the weekend and could play for the 2013 College World Series qualifier if the draft doesn't go as planned.
“(The draft) is still an option for next year,” McKay said. “It's all going to come down to that time and how things work out.
“I loved the facilities when I took my visit. I loved the coaches. They love the game, and they'll help me get to the next stage of my career.”
McKay, who also was considering offers from Wake Forest, Virginia Tech, Virginia, Tennessee, Cincinnati, West Virginia and Kent State, among others, was named the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review player of the year after going 7-0 with 101 strikeouts and just six walks in 56 innings.
He allowed one earned run for a 0.13 ERA.
McKay hit .440 with three home runs and led the Cougars to the WPIAL Class AAA quarterfinals. For that reason, Louisville recruited him as a two-player, not just a pitcher.
“I've coached high school baseball for 14 years and Legion for 26 years, and he's the most highly recruited kid I've had,” said Blackhawk coach Bob Amalia, who added that McKay is the 15th Blackhawk player since 2001 to commit to a Division I school.
McKay was named the Gatorade Pennsylvania player of the year and selected to the all-state team.
Bill Hartlep is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @TribHSInsider.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.