Brentwood sophomore hurls no-hitter in varsity debut
Brandon Mayfield enjoyed a sensational varsity debut for the Brentwood baseball team.
Mayfield, a left-handed sophomore, tossed a no-hitter against Clairton last week as the Spartans chalked up a 10-0 win in five innings.
Mayfield struck out eight and issed three free passes.
“He did a nice job for his varsity debut,” Greg Perdziola, Brentwood's veteran head coach, said. “He did a good a job keeping Clairton's hitters off balance with his curve ball.”
Three players sparked the Spartans offensively.
Brendan Mulholland, a junior first baseman, and Sean Cloonan, a senior second baseman, punched out two hits apiece. Mulholland also had two RBIs.
Nathan Christopher, a junior third baseman, drove in three runs.
Not to be out-done in Game 2, Brentwood followed up that impressive victory with a second consecutive no-hitter.
The Spartans blanked South Allegheny in seven innings, 4-0, as juniors Tyler Paranzino and Connor McWilliams combined on the no-hit performance.
Paranzino, a left-handed pitcher, started and went six innings. He fanned nine and walked two.
McWilliams, a righty, pitched one inning in relief, striking out one and walking one to pick up the save.
“Paranzino was on a roll and wanted to pitch the seventh, but his pitch count was up and we didn't want to chance anything since he has been dealing with arm issues the last couple of weeks,” Perdziola said.
Cloonan went 2 for 4 at the plate, while Paranzino and McWilliams had one hit and one RBI apiece.
“We had back-to-back no-hitters, which is most likely the first time that's happened in Brentwood baseball history,” Perdziola said. “It was a nice start, but we have a long way to go.”
Ray Fisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-388-5820 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.