Share This Page

Freeport baseball team gets welcome relief in win over Deer Lakes

| Monday, April 21, 2014, 10:48 p.m.
Dan Speicher | For the Valley News dispatch
Freeport's Brendon Zack slides safely to third base against Deer Lakes on Monday, April 21, 2014, in Freeport. Freeport won 13-2
Dan Speicher | For Valley News Dispatch
Freeport's pitcher Nathan Pastorek sends one down the lane, as he held Deer Lakes to 0 runs for 4 innings as they faced off in Freeport on Monday April 21, 2014. Freeport won 13-2

With inherited runners at first and second base, Freeport sophomore Nathan Pastorek put himself in an even tougher spot Monday afternoon when, as a relief pitcher, he hit the first Deer Lakes batter he faced during the top of the third inning.

Pastorek's pitching gem emerged from that early pressure, though.

A hit batsman was the only flaw on the day for Pastorek, who held Deer Lakes hitless over the final 3 23 innings of Freeport's 13-2 mercy-rule win. He finished with four strikeouts and no walks, and he also hit a two-run single in the bottom of the sixth to put the 10-run rule into effect.

The game started in the bottom of the first, as it was a continuation of a rain-ruined contest that started April 14. With the win, Freeport (6-4, 6-1) extended its lead in the Section 3-AA standings over defending champ Deer Lakes (7-4, 4-2).

“It was a tough situation (in the top of the third), but I made the pitches I had to make to get out of that inning without giving up a run,” said Pastorek, who replaced Matt VanTine. “(Deer Lakes) is always a good team. I was just glad to go out there and make my pitches. I had good command and good speed on the fastball.”

Pastorek struck out two after he plunked Zach Hudicek, Deer Lakes' last baserunner in the game.

Down 2-1 at the time, Freeport seized the momentum established by Pastorek's clutch play. Brendon Zack tripled and scored in the bottom of the third inning to tie the game.

Hoping its defense might deliver its own lockdown moment in the bottom of the fifth, Deer Lakes intentionally walked Matt Swartz to load the bases with one out.

That decision backfired.

A mishandled grounder allowed Hunter Fennell to score the game-deciding run. Josh Beale followed with a two-run single to left field. A wayward pickoff throw toward first base led to another Freeport run.

“With a team that hits like that, you have to make the plays in the field and throw strikes,” Deer Lakes coach Jon Pedrosky said. “It was just one of those days where we didn't make the plays, and they made every play and found every hole. It was their day today.”

By the end of the fifth inning, Freeport led 7-2. The sixth inning brought more of the same for both teams.

“I actually didn't know if I gave up a hit,” Pastorek said. “I asked one of my teammates just before the last inning if I did. I was just focused on the game.”

Freeport finished with a 10-3 edge in hits.

“I thought (the game) would go more the way it went for the first few innings,” Freeport coach Chris Graczyk said. “Hard-fought runs on both sides, that's what I expected the whole game, so to do what we did, that was not in my realm of thinking. Good things happen when you put the ball in play.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at wwest@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.