ShareThis Page

Thomas Jefferson's Stover pitches 5-hit shutout against Ringgold

| Tuesday, April 22, 2014, 12:42 a.m.
Thomas Jeffersons David Stover delivers a pitch against Ringgold on Monday, April 21, 2104 at Thomas Jefferson Field. Ronald Vezzani Jr. | for the Tribune Review

Dave Stover isn't going to overwhelm many hitters.

But make no mistake about it, the Thomas Jefferson senior right-hander doesn't need — or want — to overwhelm. That's just not his game.

Stover stuck to his meticulous pitching style during Monday's Section 4-AAA game against Ringgold and it resulted in a familiar result — a 4-0 win and a bunch of frustrated opposing hitters.

“He is not overwhelming, but he just does his job,” Thomas Jefferson coach Gregg Fouts said.

Stover did his job quite well against Ringgold.

Stover improved to 2-1. He scattered five hits over seven innings and struck out two. Stover allowed a runner on base in five of the seven innings, but only one managed to make it to third.

“He kept us in the game, and we were able to put together enough offense,” Fouts said.

The win moved Thomas Jefferson (7-4, 6-2) a half game ahead of idle South Park (7-4, 5-2) into second place in Section 4-AAA and a half game behind frontrunning West Mifflin (8-2, 6-1).

The Jaguars are two games ahead of Elizabeth Forward (6-6, 3-4) and Belle Vernon (7-4, 3-4) for the final playoff spot in the section with four games left.

Ringgold coach Mike Sikorski — a hard-throwing pitcher during his days in the Daily News League — couldn't get a grasp on why his players were so ineffective against Stover, who also shut down the Rams a year ago.

“It's hard to say,” Sikorski said. “Maybe it is his release, and that takes away a little bit of the reaction time. He stayed around the strike zone and was consistently around the zone, and he made pitches when they counted.”

Thomas Jefferson provided all the offense Stover would need in the first inning. Jake Benack singled, moved to second on Steve Kunzman's sacrifice, went to third on a wild pitch and scored on Eric Fairman's sacrifice fly to make it 1-0.

“It is important to get one across quick, because it kind of sets the tone and gets everybody relaxed and they won't press,” Fouts said.

The Jaguars made it 2-0 off Ringgold losing pitcher Nick Maciejewski in the fifth with the help of a walk, a single and an error by center fielder Nick Fowkes.

“We made a couple mistakes here and there, but we battled all the way until the end,” Sikorski said.

The Rams just couldn't get to Stover, even though they hit the ball hard at times, albeit right at somebody.

“(Stover) lives on the corners ,and he was getting a little frustrated because he wasn't getting the calls,” Fouts said. “For him not to get those calls, he had to bring them in a little bit and got a couple tagged.”

Ringgold had its best chance in the fourth when the Rams put a runner on first with one out. However, Noah Brown was caught stealing second moments before Trevor Tokach walked and Maciewjewski doubled.

“We were just trying to make something happen,” Sikorski said. “He is the fastest kid on our team, and it was one of those things that not many things were going right, might as well try something. It was a perfect throw, so it was one of those things that if it works then great. If it doesn't, then you question it.”

TJ added two more in the sixth off Fowkes to make 4-0. Joe McHugh scored on a wild pitch, and Jeremy Wasik added a sacrifice fly.

“We will take the win,” Fouts said. “It's important to get these kinds of wins.”

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.