Belle Vernon Area, baseball coach face WPIAL hearing
Belle Vernon Area baseball coach Daryl Hixenbaugh, along with district administrators, will have a hearing with the WPIAL May 14 to discuss comments Hixenbaugh made about umpires after a 2-1 loss to West Mifflin April 17.
After the game, Hixenbaugh said, “The WPIAL puts these guys on a pedestal and gives them autonomy, but they are simply not very good. I have seen some truly horrible officiating this season.”
BVA's baseball program is already on probation for incidents that took place last season and in the 2012 PIAA playoffs.
WPIAL executive director Tim O'Malley said Hixenbaugh's comments about the game officials went beyond what is permitted to be said about officials to the media.
O'Malley said the WPIAL has a specific policy about what coaches can and cannot say and “(Hixenbaugh's) comments in the newspaper went beyond what is acceptable.”
Hixenbaugh said he had written a response, which was presented to the WPIAL before its board of control meeting Wednesday.
“All I did was answer a question from a reporter as honestly as I could,” Hixenbaugh said.
BVA athletic director Jesse Cramer said the WPIAL initially informed the district that Hixenbaugh's comments violated the probation.
However, Cramer added, “(Hixenbaugh made a general statement about umpires and he made it after the game, not during it. Daryl wasn't here for any of the other things that went on (that caused the probation), so I don't know what's going to happen.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.