Charleroi stays alive in 2-AA
TribLIVE Sports Videos
One thing about these Charleroi Cougars: Their games aren't for the faint of heart.
Five of their Section 2 AA games have been decided by one run.
The latest came Friday at Vets Field when Zach Nabozny drew a bases-loaded walk to force in the winning run in a 4-3 victory over Chartiers-Houston.
The win was huge for Charleroi (8-7, 7-5) because it keeps the Cougars in the playoff race. C-H (9-4, 7-4) leads Charleroi by a half-game for the third and final playoff spot in the section.
The Bucs could have clinched the playoff berth with a win.
“It's about time we got a break that went our way,” said Charleroi coach Luke Mollis, who watched his team lose a 1-0 eight-inning heartbreaker two days earlier against Washington on an error.
“The sad thing is that we could be in better shape if a couple of those breaks could have gone our way earlier in the season,” Mollis said.
Charleroi is 2-3 in one-run section games.
Charleroi fell behind 2-0 when the Bucs scored two unearned runs against starter Josiah Fisher in the second inning.
But the Cougars scored one run in the third and two more in the fourth to take a 3-2 lead.
The Bucs tied the game in the top of the sixth on a single, a balk and a double all after two outs.
In the Charleroi seventh, freshman Josh Mavilla led off with a single and was bunted to second.
With two outs, Gunnar Riley was intentionally walked and both runners moved up on a wild pitch. After that, Sam Miceli was intentionally walked to load the bases and get to Nabozny.
Nabozny walked on five pitches to bring home the winning run.
Fisher, also a freshman, went the distance for Charleroi, giving up five hits with six strikeouts.
“Josiah is really coming on for us as a pitcher,” Mollis said. “He pitched a great game and we had a couple of hits when we needed them. It's a good win.
“We're still in the running, and we have to win out and hope Washington beats Chartiers-Houston. But it is fun to still be playing important games in May.”
Mavilla had two of the Cougars' four hits.
California 3, Jeff-Morgan 0
The Trojans (15-0, 9-0) clinched at least a share of the Section 1 A crown as Josh Luko fired his second no-hitter of the season.
Luko, a senior, struck out 11 and walked one in throwing the gem.
Louden Conte gave Luko all the run support he needed when he slugged a two-run home run in the third inning.
Luko had a single and double for the Trojans.
West Mifflin 13, Ringgold 10
The Rams (3-9, 0-9) almost knocked off first place West Mifflin (11-3, 9-1) in Section 4 AAA.
The Titans scored five runs in the bottom of the sixth inning to pull out the high-scoring win.
Gage Downer had a triple and Nick Fowkes and Conor Maciejewski each doubled for Ringgold.
Ryan Kandsberger hit a three-run home run in the big sixth for West Mifflin.
Frazier 17, Geibel 0
The Commodores (5-8, 4-4) kept their playoff hopes alive with the rout of the Gators.
Frazier, which scored 11 runs in the first inning, got a home run from Josh Miller.
Laurel Highlands 4, Yough 3
The Cougars (4-11, 2-9) gave first-place Laurel Highlands (13-3, 11-0) a scare before falling short as the Mustangs scored the game-winning run in the seventh inning.
Brandon Regotti doubled for Yough.
SoftballWest Mifflin 4, Yough 3
The Lady Cougars (5-6, 6-6) dropped the Section 3 AAA game to section leader West Mifflin (15-2, 10-2).
Cassidy Pearce had a double for Yough.
Jeff Oliver is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2666 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.