Share This Page

Riverview strikes early, beats Serra Catholic in 1st round

| Tuesday, May 13, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
RONALD VEZZANI JR. | FOR THE TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Riverview coach Rich Griser congratulates Dom Conte after his three-run homer during the first inning of a WPIAL Class A playoff game against Serra Catholic on Tuesday, May 13, 2014, at West Mifflin.

Riverview didn't know much about Serra ace Cole McCombs besides that he was a freshman and he was a pretty good pitcher.

Not being fully aware that McCombs had a 1.05 ERA and allowed only 20 hits all season heading into Tuesday's first-round WPIAL Class A playoff game against Serra Catholic probably greatly benefited the Raiders.

At least it was beneficial to Dom Conte.

Instructed to be aggressive against McCombs, Conte hammered a two-out, three-run first-inning homer that staked Riverview to an early lead. The Raiders then turned it over to senior right-hander Nick DiBucci.

DiBucci worked out of jams in the fourth, fifth and sixth innings to toss a complete game and help Riverview to the quarterfinals with a 6-1 win over Serra at West Mifflin.

Riverview (13-5) will take on 14th-seeded Union (8-7), a 6-5 upset winner over Vincentian (16-3), on Wednesday at Fox Chapel. As for Serra (11-6), it was the first time the Eagles didn't advance past the first round since 2006.

“I didn't expect to be here,” said Serra coach Brian Dzurenda, who started eight underclassmen. “I thought we were going to be a third-place team and we tied for the section. Expectations weren't super high coming into the season. I chalk it up to a learning experience. It was a good lesson learned.”

The lesson learned was simple: You can't make the kind of mistakes the Eagles did against Riverview and have a chance to win.

Serra made three errors that led to all six runs; their pitchers threw three wild pitches; they left 10 runners on base; and they were 3 of 13 with runners in scoring position — all a recipe for disaster.

“At times, a couple of the kids looked like that deer-in-the-headlights,” Dzurenda said. “Saying that, if you told me before the game that we would have more hits than them, I would've expected to win the game.”

Serra outhit Riverview, 7-5, but the Raiders came through with the big one in the first that set the tone for the game.

After an error by shortstop Brandon Coddington kept the inning alive, Conte made the Eagles pay with a blast over the left-field fence to quickly make it 3-0.

“I didn't even know where the ball went,” Conte said. “I was looking out to center field because I didn't see the ball. The first-base coach told me it was gone.”

It gave DiBucci a lead before he even stepped onto the mound.

“You dream about something like that happening in the first inning of a playoff game,” Riverview coach Rich Griser said. “Our pitcher said after that home run that there's nothing like making his job easier with a three-run homer.”

It was only the second extra-base hit McCombs allowed the entire season.

“He grooved it,” Dzurenda said.

Serra was able to answer in the bottom of the inning with a RBI single by Noah Kinser, but that would be the only run the Eagles would score.

After allowing three more unearned runs in the fourth to make it 6-1, Serra wasted a leadoff double by Zac Quattrone in the fourth, two hits in the fifth and a double, an error and a walk to load the bases in the sixth.

“We struggled with that near the end of the year,” said Dzurenda, who noted his team left 15 runners on base during a late-season loss to Bishop Canevin. “It kind of carried over to today. We couldn't get that big hit when we needed it. We expect to win every game we play because we feel that we are better prepared than every team, but just hats off to Riverview today.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.