Sewickley Academy pitcher earns his revenge against OLSH
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Beaten by OLSH two weeks earlier, Sewickley Academy left-hander Drew Johnson won the rematch that mattered most.
Inspired by a three-run lead in the first inning, Johnson pitched an efficient four-hitter Wednesday to beat section rival OLSH, 4-2, in the quarterfinals of the WPIAL Class A playoffs at North Allegheny. The junior, who needed only 93 pitches to complete all seven innings, had seven strikeouts and two walks.
“He's got the mentality that he's going to go out and win a ballgame,” Sewickley Academy coach Andrew Heck said.
It didn't happen last time. OLSH won 4-3 when Johnson pitched May 1. On that afternoon, Sewickley Academy built an early lead, but OLSH rallied late. This time, his lead never faded.
“I'm glad we could finally get him a win against OLSH,” said first baseman Joe Nagel, who drove in a run and scored another in the three-run first. “He's got great off-speed stuff, and he found it late in the game. Everything seemed to be working.”
No. 13 Sewickley Academy (9-5) and No. 5 Our Lady of the Sacred Heart (14-6) split their two Section 5 matchups. Yet, it's the lower-seeded Panthers who will face No. 1 California in the semifinals.
“Losing that second game (to OLSH) fueled our fire for this rubber match,” Heck said. “Maybe that worked out for us.”
Sewickley Academy led 3-0 after its first three batters, Mike Manzinger, John Nagel and Joe Nagel, all reached base and scored. Manzinger singled, John Nagel reached on a fielding error and Joe Nagel doubled, scoring Manzinger.
A sacrifice fly by Sam Duerr scored John Nagel.
A one-out single by Derek Littlefield scored Joe Nagel.
All nine Sewickley Academy players batted before Johnson took the mound.
“When you know you're up three (runs), you don't have to worry about mistakes,” Johnson said. “You can just go up there and pitch.”
OLSH senior starter Kyle Seamon, who allowed four hits, was replaced after just two outs. His relief, freshman Dylan Osheka, allowed only two hits over the final 6 1⁄3 innings.
“You've got to come out ready to play,” OLSH coach Phil McCarren said. “There were a couple bad bounces, we didn't make some plays and they did. That proved to be all they needed.”
OLSH scored its first run in the third, when Osheka singled and scored.
Both teams added runs in the seventh. OLSH had runners at second and third after no-out singles by Seamon and Adam Pace, who used a wild pitch to advance. Seamon scored on a groundout, but Pace was stranded when Johnson retired the final three batters in order.
“Those last two innings I was just thinking, ‘This is not happening again,' ” Johnson said. “My defense stepped up for me and we got the win.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.