Hit parade carries Shaler past Central Catholic
TribLIVE Sports Videos
On the bus ride to Churchill, Shaler coach Brian Junker asked his baseball players to close their eyes and imagine themselves with hits.
Apparently, they envisioned quite a few.
“We focus on the mental game a lot; thoughts become things,” said Junker, whose team had 12 hits with five doubles and a home run in Friday afternoon's 10-0 victory over Central Catholic in the WPIAL Class AAAA playoffs.
The first-round matchup at Woodland Hills lasted only five innings.
No. 9 seed Shaler (14-7) scored five runs in the fifth to finish it, with the final two on a homer by sophomore Alex Ficorelli, the team's ninth batter.
“Today, we just turned it on,” said senior Matt Carter, who had two doubles and scored twice. “One kid starts hitting, and it's contagious.”
Shaler's Sam Ireland had two doubles, scored twice and drove in two runs. Jim Bender had three hits, Justin Mazza reached base three times and Jim Hughes scored twice in a well-timed offensive outburst for Shaler, which had lost to Central Catholic, 5-1, on May 7.
The dozen hits didn't surprise Junker.
“The big question was: Where did the bats go for the last week of the (regular) season?” he said.
No. 16 Seneca Valley awaits Shaler on Saturday for a noon quarterfinal at Fox Chapel. Shaler hadn't won a first-round matchup since 2010.
“I honestly feel that we can beat anyone,” Carter said. “We have the pitching staff. And we have the hitting, as you saw.”
No. 8 Central Catholic (13-5) had just three hits against Shaler right-hander Jake Potock, who didn't allow a runner to reach third. The 6-foot-5 junior had three strikeouts, walked none and retired 15 of the 18 batters he faced.
“With Jake on the mound for them, they can beat anybody with the way they swung the bats,” Central Catholic coach Frank LaCava said.
Shaler used a leadoff walk by Mazza and singles from Hughes, Bender and Pat Carlson to score three first-inning runs off Central Catholic starter Grant Gustic. Shaler added one run each in the second and third innings, when Ireland and Carter doubled and scored.
Gustic had beaten Shaler last week, but the senior allowed 10 hits and eight runs in the rematch. He was replaced one out into the fifth.
“That's a good Shaler team,” LaCava said. “They hit a very good pitcher.”
Shaler's entire lineup batted in the fifth inning and seven reached base.
A two-out double by Ireland scored two runs and Ficorelli's homer to left scored two more.
Neither team had played in a week. Originally scheduled to start Tuesday, the Class AAAA playoffs were postponed by rain.
“I could say it was the layoff, but it wasn't,” LaCava said. “Shaler had a layoff just as much as we did. I'm not going to make excuses. We got beat by a good team.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.