ShareThis Page

No. 10 West Allegheny baseball earns spot in WPIAL Class AAA final

| Friday, May 23, 2014, 8:36 p.m.

Behind some timely two-out hitting and strong pitching, No. 10 West Allegheny (17-4) downed Hampton, 3-1, in a WPIAL Class AAA semifinal matchup Friday at West Mifflin.

West Allegheny got on the board first in the second inning as Nick Wiethorn's two-out double brought home Nic Daigle. After Hampton tied the game in the third on a Zach Staszak RBI groundout, the Indians broke the game open in the fourth.

After Hampton's Luke Nugent committed an error that would have ended the inning, West Allegheny starting pitcher Colin Claus helped his own cause with an RBI double. Wiethorn followed with his second double of the game to push the score to 3-1.

“To get the runner in scoring position, we got two outs and we get a stolen base and then Nick Wiethorn comes up and pokes that first one to left field. … A courtesy runner scored twice tonight so it's one of things that you get the guys in and everyone contributes, everyone knows their role,” West Allegheny coach Bryan Cornell said.

Claus allowed six hits with a walk and three strikeouts in 5 13 innings and went 2 for 3.

West Allegheny advances to the WPIAL championship game against Blackhawk at 8 p.m. Wednesday at Consol Energy Park. The Indians split a pair of matchups with Blackhawk this season, losing the first game 10-0 before winning 2-1 earlier this month.

No. 3 Hampton (13-8) was led by pitcher/third baseman Ben Vey who went five innings, giving up three runs (one earned) and seven hits. Vey also singled while Tyler Iversen went 2 for 3 with a double.

The Talbots will face West Mifflin in the consolation game Wednesday at Washington & Jefferson, with the winner earning a bid to the PIAA tournament.

“We've still got games left,” Hampton coach Gary Wilson said. “We've got to recover and go from there. We have to regroup a little bit, get our heads back on straight.”

Alex Oltmanns is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.