ShareThis Page

Riverview boys play spoiler against Springdale

| Friday, Feb. 10, 2017, 11:36 p.m.
Jan Pakler | For the Tribune-Review
Springdale sophomore Michael Zolnierczyk fights to keep the ball against the Riverview defense Friday, Feb. 10, 2017.
Jan Pakler | For the Tribune-Review
Riverview guard Nico Sero smacks the ball to a teammate during the fourth quarter against Springdale on Friday, Feb. 10, 2017.

Staring at a winless section season, Riverview put it all together Friday and spoiled rival Springdale's playoff hopes.

The Raiders, behind Nico Sero's 29 points, posted a 59-51 victory over the Dynamos at a packed Donald McGhee Fieldhouse.

Springdale (9-9, 4-8) had designs on the 33rd WPIAL playoff trip in school history, but the Raiders made a number of key plays in the fourth quarter.

“We've been close a number of times,” Riverview coach Paul Sapotichne said. “Whoever we were against, we deserved to get a win tonight. The kids still believe. The kids still work hard in practice. Tonight, defensively and offensively, they executed what we wanted to do.”

It was another memorable night for Sero. He became the leading scorer in school history with a pair of foul shots with 1 minute, 57 seconds to go in the second period. It broke Ben Erdeljac's mark of 1,317 points from 1993-97.

“It's an amazing feeling. I was glad I had my family and friends here tonight,” Sera said. “We've been so close to winning a lot of games. We finally played a complete game.”

Sero has 1,339 career points with two nonsection games remaining.

Riverview finished the section at 1-11 and is 5-15 overall.

In a key play with Riverview clinging to a 44-43 lead, Noah Black hid a fadeaway 3-pointer from the corner and was fouled. He made the free throw for a rare, four-point play with 3:20 to go.

“Something I try to avoid doing is ever saying one particular play was why the game resulted the way it did,” Dynamos coach Seth Thompson said. “However, that certainly was one that was probably a little more magnified. Suddenly, it was 48-43.”

A steal by Seamus O'Brien and a basket by Seo made it 50-43 Raiders.

The Raiders also bottled up Springdale standout Sammy Carey, double-teaming the Dynamos senior, often moving Carey away from the basket. Carey was limited to two points over the first three quarters.

“He hurt us last year twice,” Sapotichne said of Carey. “We tried to play him tough in the other game this year, but we got out of it early. He's a tough matchup because of his size, plus he's a very good player.“

Sophomore Mike Zolnierczyk picked up the scoring slack for Springdale with 12 points, 10 in the fourth period, including a pair of clutch 3-pointers.

Springdale still had a shot, down by four in the final minute. But a steal by Patrick Scott and a basket by Sero gave the Raiders a 57-51 advantage with 18.9 seconds left.

Ben Blacksmith, playing despite a foot injury, hit a 3-pointer with 5:13 left in the first half to give Riverview the lead for good.

The Raiders went up by 10 points four times, but Springdale came scrambling back.

Carey converted a three-point play with 2:02 to go, minutes after he crashed through three Raiders to get to the basket and draw a foul.

“Riverview played a great game,” Thompson said. “I told our players to give credit where credit's due. We played awful, and we played awful because they made us play that way.”

Black scored 13 points for Riverview, including four 3-pointers.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.