Basketball star Thorpe transfers back to Shaler
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Basketball standout Geno Thorpe, who transferred this summer to a Florida high school, has re-enrolled at Shaler, the senior said Monday.
The 6-foot-3 point guard moved to Orlando in July to live with his father. There, he enrolled at West Oaks Academy, a small private school with a successful basketball program.
Thorpe confirmed his return through text messages but declined further comment. He wrote on Twitter: “Due to the situation and issues at WOA I have now been registered back to Shaler.”
West Oaks coach Iren Rainey believed family issues prompted Thorpe's return to Shaler and said Thorpe had no problems at school. Thorpe missed home, Rainey said, but other circumstances also influenced his move.
“Geno wasn't the final decision-maker as far as him wanting to leave,” he said.
A Penn State recruit, Thorpe averaged 21.5 points last season for Shaler, which reached the WPIAL Class AAAA semifinals.
Thorpe said he plans to rejoin Shaler's team, and coach Paul Holzshu said Thorpe would be welcomed back to the program with no hard feelings.
West Oaks Academy went 38-1 last season and won the Sunshine Independent Athletic Association title, which operates outside Florida's state association.
Rainey called Thorpe “a great kid with a bright future.”
Rainey understands the plight of transfer students better than most. In 2002, with his mother living in Europe, Rainey was a star senior for Farrell after transferring from Oak Hill Academy in Virginia. But the WPIAL ruled Rainey ineligible and forced Farrell to forfeit games.
“It's not easy leaving your comfort zone and being away from home,” Rainey said.
Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-380-5666.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.