Cheswick Christian boys team will rely on experience
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Depth and experience have been issues in the past for Cheswick Christian Academy boys basketball coach Todd Rosio. But this year, those things could make all the difference as the Chargers look to improve on a 15-13 mark, 11-5 in the Southwest Christian Athletic Conference.
Cheswick finished second in the East division and made it to the playoffs but fell short in the semifinals.
“We're such a small school. We struggle sometimes with depth,” Rosio said. “There aren't that many boys in the school, so there aren't that many boys on the team. But we have some strength in numbers this year, so it could be a different year.”
The team returns all five starters from last year and features a roster that will have five seniors in guards Tyler Knupp , Andrew Maust, Ben Johnson, Ian Farley and center Bobby Wilson.
Leading the way will be Knupp, Maust, Johnson, Wilson and sophomore Antione Malloy. Knupp, a 6-foot all-conference guard, was the leading scorer and rebounder last season, averaging 14.8 points and 8.6 rebounds per game.
He also averaged 3.5 assists.
Malloy (5-7), the lone sophomore, led the Chargers in steals as a freshman with 85.
“I think having everybody back gives us an opportunity to have a successful year,” Rosio said. “Last year, we didn't have any seniors. Even though they want to win, there is a different sense of urgency when you have seniors.”
Coming off the bench will be junior guard/forwards Ian Swartz and JaJuan Malloy.
Reaching the semifinals was an accomplishment last season, but winning the division is the goal according to Rosio.
“I think everybody will be disappointed if we don't win our division,” Rosio said. “If you get in the playoffs, anything can happen. It's one game at a time. I think the seniors have their sights on winning as much as they can.”
D.J. Vasil is a freelancer writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.