Springdale girls basketball team to rely on seniors
Springdale High School girls head basketball coach Dan Ross watches over practice at Springdale High School on Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2012.
Photo by Erica Hilliard | Valley News Dispatch
The Springdale girls basketball team is dealing with the loss of several key players from last season.
Erin Gilmartin and Mary Holmes — the team's leading scorer and rebounder, respectively, last season — graduated. But despite the loss of leadership, Dynamos coach Dan Ross expects to have a senior-led team again this year.
“We have three seniors, and they're the only players with a lot of varsity experience,” Ross said. “There are some juniors expected to step up.”
This year's team is expected to be led by senior guard Madeline Glamp, the team's second-best scorer as a junior with an average of 9.0 points and 5.0 rebounds per game.
Other key players are seniors Diana Killian and Sydney Smajda.
For Springdale to take the next step in a tough Section 3-AA, it will need improved depth from its underclassmen. Ross said juniors Alex Gradwell, Amanda Koprivikar, Sarah Udanis and Keely Mager have enough experience to make an impact.
Aside from the seniors, the Dynamos are a relatively young team. They also are slightly undersized with no player taller than 5-foot-8. To make up for the lack of size, the Dynamos intend to run an up-tempo style.
“We have to be more defensive this year,” Ross said. “We lack some skill with some of our younger kids, and we'll try to do some things in transition.”
Springdale finished 8-15 and was 6-6 (third place) in Section 3-AA last season. The Dynamos lost to Quaker Valley in the preliminary round of the playoffs.
The Dynamos will open the season at 6:30 p.m. Friday against Knoch in the Springdale tip-off tournament. They will open section play Dec. 17 at East Allegheny.
Jesse Huba is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.