West Shamokin holds off Ford City
TribLIVE Sports Videos
During a Section 1-AA boys basketball game in which no lead appeared to be safe, West Shamokin's student section began to chant, “Start the bus!” with about 35 seconds left in the fourth quarter.
Ford City almost made the Wolves' fans look mighty foolish.
Despite missing seven fourth-quarter free throws, West Shamokin hung on to win the section opener, 64-62, at home after it led by nine points with less than two minutes remaining.
The Wolves (2-2, 1-0) actually trailed Ford City (2-3, 0-1) by a double-digit margin in the first quarter and failed to get a field goal until more than five minutes, 30 seconds elapsed, but they stormed back and ultimately led for the entire second half.
“For every good play we make, we make two bad plays,” West Shamokin coach Mike Nagy said. “We're giving the ball up too easily. We're not playing strong. I thought Ford City did a great job; they jumped on us…fortunately, we didn't panic.”
Ford City opened the game with a 10-0 run. Jesse Sequeira fueled the charge with a transition basket, a layup in the right lane and a 3-pointer.
West Shamokin switched from its man-to-man defense to a zone, an adjustment that stifled the Sabers' speed and contributed to eight first-quarter turnovers for Ford City. Damon Craig made two free throws with 2:50 left in the first quarter to end the shutout, and Zane Clowser's jumper followed 24 seconds later.
By the end of the quarter, the Wolves led, 14-10, with Zac Horner's desperation 3-pointer at the buzzer serving as an exclamation point.
Clowser and Horner continued to pace West Shamokin's offense. Both attacked the driving lanes and drew fouls. Clowser, who also made four 3-pointers, finished with a team-high 23 points for the Wolves, who led, 31-28, at halftime and, 48-44, after three quarters. Horner added 10 points.
“I just get the ball and see what I can do most effectively,” Clowser said. “If I can dish it off and get a better shot for someone else, I'll do that.”
Ford City's David Lattanzio provided fourth-quarter heroics that kept spectators intrigued. After scoring 11 points in the first half, he added 16 in the second — 10 coming in the final quarter. He sank one of his three 3-pointers to begin the Sabers' climb back from the nine-point deficit, and he made his final four free throws to finish 11 of 13 at the line.
“That's his job,” Ford City coach Greg Hutcherson said. “Just like (Jon) Shanty last year, his job is to lead us and be a scorer and take over games. Dave knows that, he answered and he did what he's supposed to do.”
Sequeira, who cooled considerably after the hot start, returned to the spotlight with 15.8 seconds left when he made a layup in the left lane, drew a foul and made the free throw to cut Ford City's deficit to two points. He finished with 13 points.
Somewhat surprisingly, Andrew Labutka, a starting senior guard with no points, took the game's final shot. His 3-point attempt from the left side just missed, hitting the back of the rim and floating high and a bit wide.
“When you're down whatever it was in the fourth quarter, and you storm back and have a shot to win it at the end, and it rattles in and out, you can't get mad at that,” Hutcherson said. “It was just that some balls bounced their way that we wanted.”
Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-543-1303.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.