Fox Chapel boys split pair of tough games
The Fox Chapel High School boys basketball team ran its record to 8-0 with a narrow 67-65 win over Hempfield on Thursday in the Montour Tournament.
The teams were tied at 51 entering the fourth quarter.
Matt D'Amico scored 25 points while Brian Papich scored 18 to go along with five assists, five rebounds and five steals.
The Foxes' unbeaten record came to an end on Friday as they fell to Beaver Falls, 79-73. D'Amico scored 32 points.
“It was a very good tournament,” FC coach Zach Skrinjar said. “We were in two very competitive, intense games.”
Skrinjar said both D'Amico and Papich have been playing well.
“Matt and Brian are doing very well and, even though they are juniors, are establishing themselves as two of the better players in the WPIAL,” he said. “The stats speak for themselves.”
Skrinjar said the team will view the loss to Beaver Falls just as it does any other game.
“We'll use the game tape to improve as a team and prepare for the second half of section play,” he said.
“We still have to commit to defending and rebounding and we need to constantly improve in both those areas.”
Shady Side Academy hosted the Peter Sauer ‘95 Memorial tournament last Thursday, Friday and Saturday.
The Indians opened the event with a 69-63 win over Highlands on Thursday.
They led by 11-8 after one quarter and 29-25 at the half.
Mike Ware led SSA with 22 points. Pat Loughran contributed 10, Aaron Horne added nine and Dan Marous scored eight.
The Indians lost to Bethel Park on Friday, 55-23, and fell to Riverside, 51-47 on Saturday.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.