Leechburg boys open section with big win
Leechburg's boys basketball team opened Section 4-A play in a big way. The Blue Devils scored a season-high 74 points in their win over Winchester Thurston.
Three players finished in double figures for Leechburg (5-5, 1-0), which prevailed, 74-46, after trailing by nine through the first quarter.
Ben Ritchie scored a game-high 21 points, Chris Swank added 18 and Jacob Iellimo had 16, nine of which came on 3-pointers.
Iellimo also had 10 rebounds, and Swank grabbed nine. Ritchie finished with five steals.
Winchester Thurston (1-4, 0-1) led, 18-9, after the first quarter and trailed only 36-29 at halftime. But it scored just nine points in the third quarter and eight in the fourth.
Tyler Coleman led Winchester Thurston with 11 points, and Max Calhoun added 10.
West Shamokin 35, Springdale 28 — Jill Glover made 11 field goals to finish with 22 points and also grabbed 15 rebounds for West Shamokin (6-5, 2-1) in the non-section game. Tristan Cribbs (six points, nine rebounds) was the only other member of the Lady Wolves with multiple buckets.
Alex Gladwell scored a team-high 11 points for Springdale, which led, 14-13, at halftime but was outscored, 12-5, in the third quarter.
Seneca Valley 54, Kittanning 39 — Kittanning (5-6) fell behind, 19-11, after one quarter in the nonsection contest against Class AAAA Seneca Valley (6-3). Cassie Merryman led the Lady Wildcats with 15 points, and Emily Knepshield added 10. Melissa Carter scored 19 points for the Lady Raiders, and Lexus Lambert contributed 14.
Burrell 61, West Shamokin 6 — Brian Brown pinned Dustin Maloney in the 152-pound bout to deliver West Shamokin (0-8, 0-3) its only points in the Section 3(B)-AA dual meet.
Burrell (5-3, 3-0) won seven bouts by forfeit.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.