Share This Page

Gateway edges Fox Chapel in 1st-place showdown

| Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013, 11:08 p.m.

Fox Chapel had four chances to tie the game against Gateway in a battle between the last two undefeated teams in Section 2-AAAA.

But the Gators held off the visiting Foxes on all four sequences to emerge with a 40-38 victory.

Fox Chapel junior Matt D' Amico, who led all scorers with 18 points, misfired on a 3-point shot at the buzzer.

The Gators (9-1, 5-0) took over sole possession of first place, while Fox Chapel dropped to 4-1 in the section, 9-2 overall.

Fox Chapel's Connor Duquette drew a charge from forward Tom Kromka, and Alden Stone stole the ball with 12 seconds left, but the Foxes couldn't convert.

“That was the best that we've played, collectively, on defense all year,” Foxes coach Zack Skrinjar said. “We ran some action off the right side on the last play. It was exactly how we drew it up, to take a three.”

Gateway has won its last three section games by three points or fewer.

“Until we learn to knock down free throws and quit turning the ball over, that's what it's going to be like,” Gators coach Mitch Adams said.

Gateway took a 21-12 lead with 3:28 left in the second quarter, but the Foxes answered with a 12-0 run for a 24-21 lead.

Dennis Boyce had 11 points and Kromka added 10, including eight of Gateway's 10 fourth-quarter points.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.