ShareThis Page

GCC nips Jeannette on late 3-pointer

| Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013, 3:02 p.m.
Greensburg Central Catholic's Brian Graytok goes up for two over Jeannette guard Julian Batts during their January 15, 2013 contest in Jeannette. Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
Greensburg Central Catholic's Brian Graytok goes up for two after making a move on Jeannette guard Jordan Edmunds during their January 15, 2013 contest in Jeannette. Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
Greensburg Central Catholic guard Zach Herman goes up for two of his game-high 26 points during their January 15, 2013 contest versus Jeannette in Jeannette. Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
Greensburg Central Catholic guard Christian Hyland pumps his fist and Jeannette guard Julian Batts hangs his head during the final moments of their January 15, 2013 contest in Jeannette. Hyland hit what proved to be the game-winning 3-pointer in the Centurions' 65-61 victory. Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review

The drama and suspense of neighboring rivals Greensburg Central Catholic and Jeannette continued Tuesday night with a see-saw boys basketball battle between Section 3-AA leaders.

In the end, GCC emerged with a 65-61 victory that appeared closer than even the four-point margin indicated.

“We were lucky to come out on top today,” GCC coach Greg Bisignani said.

Zach Herman scored 26 points and Christian Hyland hit a go-ahead 3-point shot with 45 seconds left to lift visiting No. 3 Greensburg Central Catholic (14-1, 6-0) over No. 2 Jeannette (12-2, 5-1) and into sole possession of first place.

Brian Graytok added 15 points for GCC, which won its sixth game in a row following a 20-point loss to Class AAAA No. 2 Gateway on Dec. 28.

“Most times, when these two schools get together — in any sport — you can expect it to be a close outcome,” Bisignani said.

The victory comes at the same site one night after the Jeannette girls upset No. 5 GCC, 72-70.

“It's a lot of fun to play against these guys,” Herman said. “Win or lose tonight, this was a great game.”

Julian Batts led Jeannette with 25 points. Duke Brown added 20 for the Jayhawks, who had a four-game winning streak stopped. Their only prior loss was a 66-40 decision to Brentwood (Tenn.) on Dec. 28.

Jeannette trailed, 30-28, at halftime after the teams played to a 15-all first-quarter tie. On both occasions, Jeannette scored at the buzzer on 3-pointers — Batts finding the mark from beyond the arc at the first-quarter stop and Brown sinking another at the halftime mark.

As an added measure, GCC and Jeannette started the fourth quarter tied at 48 in advance of a furious finish.

Miles Sunder's field goal with 1:31 left — his only basket of the game — pulled Jeannette even at 61 before Hyland's 3-pointer from the corner gave GCC a 64-61 lead.

After Herman missed the front end of a 1-and-1, Brown misfired on a 3-point attempt with 9 seconds left and the Jayhawks were forced to foul.

Herman hit one of two shots to give GCC its final margin.

“We may have needed this. We didn't play as hard as we should have, and that's uncharacteristic of us,” Jeannette coach Adrian Batts said. “I knew it was going to be a close game. We had some shots there at the end that didn't fall. This is far from over. This was Round 1. We've got to be ready to play them again.”

The regular-season rematch is Feb. 28 at GCC.

Dave Mackall is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.