High school roundup: Short-handed West Shamokin wrestlers make good showing
TribLIVE Sports Videos
West Shamokin wrestling coach Matt Reefer has encouraged the members of his limited lineup to focus on winning “on the mat,” because the Wolves, who forfeit more than half the weight classes, aren't likely to come out on top in the team score this season.
But Wednesday night, the Wolves came awfully close to a victory.
West Shamokin won all five of the contested bouts against Summit Academy but finished with a 36-29 loss.
The point total was West Shamokin's highest of the season.
Brian Lukehart opened the Section 3(B)-AA match with a third-period pin in the 120-pound bout.
David Batistig (126 pounds) followed with a 13-2 major decision, and Alex Boyer added a 13-5 major decision to help the Wolves (0-10, 0-4).
Two forfeits followed, both in favor Summit Academy (5-9, 1-3), played a key role. There were six forfeits.
Brian Brown won, 8-3, at 152 pounds, and Brenden Glover secured a pin 56 seconds into the 160-pound bout.
John Wissinger benefited from West Shamokin's only forfeit win.
West Shamokin, which has completed section competition, will compete in the Berlin Brothersvalley duals tournament Saturday.
Apollo-Ridge 75, Highlands 51 — A quintet of players finished in double figures for Apollo-Ridge (11-3), which pulled away in the second half after nursing a four-point lead at the half.
Alex Smith, Evan Davis, and Josh Reynolds all scored 14 points for the Vikings (11-3), while Connor Billingsley and Tre Tipton chipped in 12 apiece. Julian Flenory and Aquelay Frison registered 16 points each for Highlands (0-15).
Springdale 44, Leechburg 21 — Missy Jones scored 10 points in the nonsection loss for Leechburg (0-13), which was outscored, 18-4, in the first quarter.
Amanda Koprivnikar led Springdale (7-8) with 12 points.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.