High school roundup: Freeport boys fall to Knoch in 2OT
TribLIVE Sports Videos
In front of its home crowd, Freeport's boys basketball team just barely missed out on a season-changing victory Friday night.
The Yellowjackets lost to Knoch, 64-63, in double overtime. Brendan Lynch fueled the offense with 31 points, 10 of which came at the foul line and nine of which came on 3-pointers.
Robbie Miller added 15 points for Freeport (5-7, 2-5), which was tied with Knoch, 41-41, after three quarters.
David Gallagher scored 19 points to lead the Knights (9-5, 4-3), who strengthened their hold on fourth place in Section 1-AAA.
Kittanning 48, Highlands 41 — Kevin Barnes scored a game-high 20 points, and Sterling Henry added 10 for Kittanning (12-2, 5-2), which led, 17-8, after the first quarter of the Section 1-AAA game. Kaison Branch led Highlands (0-16, 0-7) with 13 points, and Aquelay Frison contributed 10.
Apollo-Ridge 66, Summit Academy 63 — Tre Tipton, Alex Smith and Josh Reynolds each scored 14 points for Apollo-Ridge (12-3, 4-2), which held off an upset bid by Summit Academy (4-10, 2-4) in Section 1-AA. Lucas Burrell chipped in 12 points for the Vikings, who led, 34-29, at halftime.
Doug Brooks poured in 22 points for Summit Academy, including three 3-pointers.
St. Joseph 78, Leechburg 71 — Ben Ritchie made five 3-pointers during a 26-point night, and Jake Iellimo and Chris Swank added 22 and 13, respectively, for Leechburg (6-8, 2-3), which trailed, 40-28, at halftime of the Section 4-A contest.
John Arcuri made 22 of 27 free throws and finished with a career-high 41 points for St. Joseph (7-9, 3-2).
The game included 57 fouls.
West Shamokin 56, Union-Rimersburg 42 — Jill Glover scored a game-high 21 points, and Tristan Cribbs made four 3-pointers as part of a 14-point night for West Shamokin (8-8), which led, 31-7, at halftime in the nonsection game.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.