High school roundup: Kittanning girls stay in playoff hunt
By Staff Reports
Published: Monday, Jan. 21, 2013, 10:56 p.m.
Even with several starters out with injuries, Kittanning's girls basketball team has stayed on the heels of the teams just above it in the Section 1-AAA standings.
The Wildcats overcame a slow start to top Knoch, 46-32, at home Monday night. Kittanning (8-8, 6-2) trailed, 8-7, after the first quarter and outscored the Lady Knights (3-12, 2-6) by 11 in the second.
Emily Knepshield scored 12 points to lead Kittanning, and Alaina Thomas finished with 10.
Sam Logan and Allie Megahan each scored 8 points for Knoch.
Kittanning remains one game behind Mars and two behind Hampton in the standings.
West Shamokin 48, Leechburg 12 — Jill Glover finished with 20 points, and Kelly Clowser added nine for West Shamokin (9-9, 3-4) in the Section 1-AA win. Tessa Verner led Leechburg (0-15, 0-7) with 5 points.
Deer Lakes 44, Ford City 27 — Becca Babincak surpassed 1,000 career points with a 21-point effort for Deer Lakes (12-2, 5-1) in the Section 1-AA contest.
Allyson Cujas scored nine points to lead Ford City (8-7, 4-4).
Freeport 53, Valley 51 — Zoe Sollis scored 20 points, and Kayla Bowser added 10 for Freeport (6-9, 4-4), which led by five at halftime of the Section 1-AAA game.
Kaylyn Iacopino led Valley (2-9, 2-6) with 20 points, and Lashay Madison contributed 19.
Leechburg 60, United 52 — Jacob Iellimo and Chris Swank each finished with double-doubles, while Randy Smail scored a team-high 15 points for Leechburg (7-8) in the nonsection win.
Iellimo had 12 points and 14 rebounds, and Swank had 14 points and 11 rebounds. Alex Sipolino added 10 points for the Blue Devils, who trailed, 25-22, at halftime but outscored United (0-15) by 13 points in the third quarter.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.