ShareThis Page

Thomas Jefferson's scoring spurts lock down victory

| Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, 12:20 a.m.
Christopher Horner
Thomas Jefferson's Joe Carroll drives past East Allegheny's Josh Strawins during their game Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2013, in Jefferson Hills. TJ won, 65-42. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Thomas Jefferson's Joe Carroll scores against East Allegheny's Gerald O'Keefe during their game Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2013 in Jefferson Hills. TJ won, 65-42.

If Thomas Jefferson coach Dom DeCicco didn't believe that basketball is a game of runs, he might now.

In a game that had 16 ties or lead changes over the first 12 minutes, Thomas Jefferson put together a solid final 20 minutes against East Allegheny, highlighted by a couple of impressive runs, to remain unbeaten and on top of the Section 4-AAA standings with a 65-42 win.

“East Allegheny is a scary team,” DeCicco said. “They are a team that can put points on the board and, fortunately, we were able to slow them down and put together some runs.”

Thomas Jefferson (11-4, 7-0) limited East Allegheny (7-9, 3-5) to 20 points below its season average and 19 fewer than its first meeting — a 68-61 Thomas Jefferson win Dec. 18.

Joe Carroll scored a game-high 24 points, including 16 in the first half for the Jaguars. Chase Winovich added 14 points.

East Allegheny got 12 points from Joel Randolph and 11 from Shawn Adair. EA hit only 5-of-27 shots from the floor in the decisive second half, including 2 of 11 from 3-point range.

“We really pride ourselves on our defense,” Carroll said. “We always want to come out and give up the least points possible, and that's what we tried to do.”

It didn't hurt that Thomas Jefferson supplemented its defense with a couple game-altering runs, including:

• A 10-2 run to end the first half to snap a 24-24 tie.

• A 12-0 run over a span of 6:56 of the third and fourth quarters to expand the lead to 16.

• A 10-4 run to end the game.

Thomas Jefferson outscored East Allegheny, 41-16, over the final 18:40.

“We were able to put together a couple runs because of our defense,” DeCicco said. “We are not a team that is going to wow you, but we will get the job done. We thought we were giving them a lot of easy looks early on so we wanted to play an honest, hard half-court defense.”

DeCicco was more than happy to grind it out in the half court.

“What we preached the last couple days of practice is that when it comes playoff time, that it is a grind,” DeCicco said. “Teams are going to take away your transition in the playoffs, and it is going to be a half-court game. You have to be able to lock down and execute on the offensive end of the court.”

East Allegheny answered TJ bucket for bucket into the second quarter before a couple of Carroll steals that he turned into points at end of the first half put the Jaguars ahead, 34-26.

Adair hit a pair of 3-pointers early in the second half to get the Wildcats within 39-35.

After that, it was all TJ.

Carroll hit three jumpers, Winovich banged underneath for a pair of baskets, and Adam Miller scored a pair to put TJ up, 51-35.

“We just came into the second half and outworked them,” Winovich said. “That is all it was. Who was the better team? We wanted to show East Allegheny and all the teams we play that we can shut them down. This was a good win for us. When we play our game, we are tough to beat.”

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.