SSA girls win one, lose one
The Shady Side Academy girls basketball team beat South Allegheny, 37-32, in Section 3-AA action on Jan. 22.
The Indians led 18-17 at the half and increased their advantage to 37-33 after three quarters.
Gabby Harchelroad led the Indians with 10 points.
“It wasn't a pretty win but it was a win,” SSA coach Audrey Scott said. “We did what we had to do.”
The Indians couldn't sustain the momentum as they traveled to Riverview on Thursday and lost by a score of 61-37.
The Indians were in the game for a half and trailed by 24-20 after two quarters.
The Raiders outscored SSA by 16-9 in the third to break it open. Harchelroad had 15 points.
“This is the way that our season has been going,” Scott said. “We just don't have any type of consistency.
“We have to start putting a string of good games together. We still have our sights set on making the playoffs but we have to play better than this.”
FC girls hoops
The Fox Chapel girls basketball team picked up a pair of section wins last week as they continued their march to the playoffs.
The Foxes crushed Franklin Regional, 73-43, on Jan. 22.
Coach Meghan Meabon's team rolled to a 46-17 halftime lead.
Erin Mathias led all scorers with 18 points while Taylor Cohen scored 17 and Kayla Slovenec scored a dozen.
The Foxes hosted Woodland Hills on Saturday and cruised to a 69-45 win.
The game was close at the half with the Foxes holding a 29-24 edge.
They outscored the Wolverines, 15-8, in the third quarter and 25-13 in the final period.
Mathias was a force on offense and on the boards as she scored 19 points and snared 20 rebounds. Anna Palumbo scored 17, including three 3-pointers. Slovenec scored 13 and Alexa Yaksich scored 12.
The Foxes are now 13-4 and 8-1 in Section 2-AAAA.
“It was a good week,” Meabon said. “We're getting key contributions from a lot of different players.
“Our focus is on one game at a time. We're in a good position in the section but we've got some big games left.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.