Share This Page

Young lineup leads North Allegheny to 1st section title in 9 years

| Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Christopher Horner
Shaler's Paige Quinn pressures North Allegheny's Meg Morningstar during their Section 3-AAAA game Monday in Shaler. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review

As recently as mid-autumn, the lone senior on the team had barely even met many of her teammates.

North Allegheny's young melting pot has come together quickly — and better than the Tigers could have imagined.

Despite having only two true carryovers from last season's varsity team, North Allegheny is having its best girls basketball season in about a decade. The Tigers are 17-2 overall and have clinched their first section title in nine years. NA can finish the season 11-1 in Section 3-AAAA and run its winning streak to 15 with a victory Friday night against rival North Hills.

“I'm real happy with how we've responded to different challenges throughout the season and how the girls have come together,” coach Sherri McConnell said. “Coming into this year, we only had a couple girls that had even had a varsity uniform last year, so we had a lot of girls coming from a lot of different teams — varsity, JV, the ninth-grade team and three middle-school teams. So for them to come together and mesh and develop chemistry, they have been impressive.”

The Tigers previously had won a section title in 2003-04. Since, they haven't had a losing record, but they also have won a total of only two playoff games.

It's safe to assume none of those teams entered a given season as inexperienced as North Allegheny was heading into this one. At a school that size, it's unheard of to have only one senior on a roster.

“Coming in, I was not quite sure how the season would go,” senior point guard Maddie Nellis said. “I hadn't gotten to meet the girls other than a few who were on the team last year. ... But once I did, I saw they all love the game and love playing and love playing hard. That's what has gotten us as far as we are right now.”

That — and defense.

North Allegheny hasn't allowed more than 47 points in any game this season and has allowed more than 38 only four times. Its 32.5 opponent scoring average is best among WPIAL Class AAAA teams and sixth-best in all of the WPIAL.

“The focus is on defense first,” McConnell said. “We've gotten them to believe in the defensive end.”

Among the Tigers' best defensive players are 5-foot-7 freshman guard Abby Gonzales, 5-5 sophomore guard Devvin LaBarge, 6-1 sophomore forward Meg Morningstar and 5-11 junior forward Danielle Wall. Morningstar is a proficient shot-blocker, LaBarge is a tough defender on the ball and Gonzales often is matched up against the opposing team's top offensive threat.

An all-around player — particularly for her age — Gonzales is the Tigers' leading scorer at 10.6 points per game heading into the week. Largely because of her shooting range, LaBarge follows as North Allegheny's second-leading scorer.

Offense also is provided in large part by 5-5 junior guard Taylor Brennan, who joined Nellis as the team's most experienced players coming into the season.

Wall and 5-9 freshman forward Taylor Lake are physical presences inside for a team that McConnell said has seven starters because each has started several games.

“We have learned from each other quickly, and I think we play well together,” Nellis said. “All of the younger kids have stepped up.

“They're only losing me (after) this season, so in a couple years this definitely is a team that's going to be exciting to watch. But even this season, we want to go as far as we can in the playoffs.”

Chris Adamski is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.