Three players scored in double figures to “propel” Ford City's boys basketball team to a non-section victory on Saturday.
The Sabers rallied to snap a four-game losing streak with a 67-57 victory over visiting Propel Andrew Street. They trailed, 19-9, after the first quarter and 27-26 at the half.
Jesse Sequeira scored a team-high 21 points, while David Lattanzio and
Brandon Heilman added 17 and 11 points, respectively, for Ford City (5-14).
Isaiah Adams led Propel Andrew Street with 29 points.
Gateway 57, Plum 40 — Gateway (13-4, 10-2) put together a 9-3 run coming out of halftime and forced Plum to commit 27 turnovers in a Section 2-AAAA win over the Mustangs (9-10, 5-7).
Delvon Randall scored all 11 of his points in the second half for the Gators. Teammate Tommy Kromka added 10 points.
Nick Stotler had 10 points and five rebounds for Plum, which hit five 3-pointers.
Cheswick Christian Academy 66, First Baptist 23 — Antione Malloy scored 18 points, JaJuan Malloy added 13 and Andrew Maust had 10 to lead the Chargers (15-5, 9-0 SWCAC) to their 10th straight win.
Ford City 63, Propel Andrew Street 26 — Ford City built a 33-11 halftime lead and cruised to a non-section win. Allyson Cujas led the Sabers with 21
points, and Christina Davis registered 10 points, seven rebounds and six assists.
Kittanning 31, St. Joseph 25 — Emily Knepshield led the way with 13 points as Class-AAA Kittanning (9-12) defeated the Class-A Spartans (10-11) in a non-section matchup to snap a four-game losing streak. Mallory Heinle scored 18 for St. Joseph.
Both teams have qualified for the WPIAL playoffs.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.