ShareThis Page

Southmoreland boys basketball team loses regular-season finale

| Monday, Feb. 11, 2013, 10:33 p.m.
Southmoreland's Mike Mucha drives for a layup during the game against Waynesburg on Monday, Feb. 11, 2013. Lori Padilla/For the Daily Courier
Southmoreland's Jacob Porter looks to control the ball while being pressured by Waynesburg's Willy Ziefel during Monday's game. Lori Padilla/For the Daily Courier

Monday's season finale was a reflection of the whole season for the Southmoreland boys basketball team. The Scotties put in the effort, tried to fight through adversity, but ultimately didn't get the desired results in a 71-62 loss to visiting Waynesburg.

“It was a microcosm of our season,” Southmoreland coach Frank Muccino said after his team endured the loss, which sealed an 0-21 season for the Scotties.

“We do things well in spurts, but we're not consistent enough. We didn't make the plays when we needed to make them. There were probably five or six of those types of plays (Monday). Those are the plays that if you win, you make and when you lose, you don't make.”

The Scotties trailed for nearly the entire game against the Raiders, but despite being down, Southmoreland continually managed to keep the game close. Southmoreland started slow and fell behind, 9-2, but pulled to within 21-20, only to see Waynesburg's Wes Bristor hit a buzzer-beating 3-pointer to close the first quarter and give the visitors a 24-20 edge.

Adam Fox had a huge game for the Raiders, scoring 12 points in the first quarter on his way to a 26-point effort. John Glenn Davis finished with 14 points, and Dom Sarra added 12 points.

In the second, Zac Black and Jacob Porter each made a 3-pointer to help Southmoreland take a brief lead. Black and Randy Ohler led the Scotties with 13 points. Porter scored 12 points, and Justin Livengood had 11 points.

However, Waynesburg's Dom Sarra hit three shots to help the Raiders hold a 39-32 lead at the half.

“We were fortunate,” Waynesburg coach Dave Sarra said. “We had some bad possessions, but somehow we maintained a lead. Sometimes we would get a putback or a 3-pointer, and then we would exchange buckets with them.”

Southmoreland hung tough and was able to pull within 47-46 late in the third quarter, but Waynesburg closed the quarter with a 7-0 run to stay in front, 54-46.

The fourth quarter was similar to the first three. Waynesburg built a lead, but Southmoreland would come back. At one point, the Scotties cut the Waynesburg advantage to 62-60, but Waynesburg (5-17) managed to seal the win with a 9-2 run.

For the Scotties, it was another disappointing loss, although it wasn't for lack of trying.

“We started slow, but we came back,” Muccino said. “I can't fault the effort.”

According to Dave Sarra, the experience of playing one final game was good for both teams.

“It was an evenly matched game with two clubs that have scrappy kids that play hard,” Dave Sarra said. “I think it was good for both teams to battle and compete.”

Jason Black is the local sports editor of the Daily Courier. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.