ShareThis Page

Vincentian jumps on rival North Catholic early, remains undefeated

Chris Harlan
| Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, 10:22 p.m.
Vincentian's Brenna Wise puts up a shot over North Catholic's Paige Kizior (43) and Evelyn Brazil during their game Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013 at Marshall Middle School.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Vincentian's Brenna Wise puts up a shot over North Catholic's Paige Kizior (43) and Evelyn Brazil during their game Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013 at Marshall Middle School.

The first meeting with North Catholic, decided by just one point, was the only serious challenge Vincentian Academy's unbeaten record has faced.

This time, though, the Royals made sure it wasn't close.

“We were coming out strong,” said sophomore Brenna Wise, who scored 16 points in Thursday night's 50-33 victory over North Catholic, giving Vincentian the Section 2-A title all alone. “We came with heart, and we just wanted it more.”

Kayla Key added 13 point for No. 1 Vincentian (21-0, 12-0), the defending WPIAL champion. The Royals have one game left, against Gateway.

“Going undefeated wasn't really our main concern,” Vincentian coach Ron Moncrief said, “but since we're undefeated now and there's only one game to play, we might as well go for it.”

Not only have the Royals beaten every opponent, they have outscored them by an average of 30 points. Six times the Royals have won by at least 40, including one 52-point section victory.

That's why the Vincentian hadn't forgotten the Jan. 14 game on Troy Hill, a slim 65-64 victory over No. 3 North Catholic (13-8, 10-2).

Now, three weeks later, the Royals used the final two quarters to steadily build a double-digit lead. That included an 8-0 run to start the fourth at North Allegheny's Marshall Middle School, an alternate home court for Vincentian.

“They played harder than us tonight,” North Catholic coach Molly Rottmann said. “Our kids didn't play hard; they played scared.”

The lead peaked at 20 when sophomore Sarah Marusic made a 3-pointer with 3:50 left.

“We felt like we let some plays in the first game get away from us,” Vincentian coach Ron Moncrief said. “We wanted to correct those mistakes.”

Vincentian used more zone defense this time than during the first game, Moncrief said, determined to keep North Catholic star Lauren Wolosik from driving to the basket. Wolosik, a Central Connecticut State recruit, still scored 19.

Wolosik had 32 in their first game. That included a closing-seconds basket that nearly was the winner until Wise answered with another. This time, the outcome was decided much earlier.

“We played so tough the first game,” Rottman said. “I don't know why we'd come in hesitant or afraid, but we did and they took advantage. ... Vincentian is a very good team, but we're certainly better than what we put out there this evening.”

Vincentian, which led 13-7 after one quarter, held a 26-19 edge at halftime. The lead reached double digits during the third quarter, when North Catholic was outscored, 15-8.

Last year, these teams also met in the WPIAL championship and the PIAA semifinals. For that to happen again, North Catholic needs to respond, Rottman said.

“If we can regroup and decide that's the team we don't want to be, I think there could be a third meeting,” Rottmann said. “But we have to find ourselves.”

Moncrief wouldn't count out another rematch.

“Going on history,” he said, “we'll probably see them again.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.