ShareThis Page

Elizabeth Forward rides fast start to win over Belle Vernon

| Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, 11:10 p.m.
Elizabeth Forward's Olivia Barkley attempts a layup past Belle Vernon defender Phaedra DeWitt on Thursday, February 7, 2013 at Belle Vernon.  (Ronald Vezzani Jr.  |  For the Daily News)
Elizabeth Forward's Olivia Barkley attempts a layup past Belle Vernon defender Phaedra DeWitt on Thursday, February 7, 2013 at Belle Vernon. (Ronald Vezzani Jr. | For the Daily News)

Elizabeth Forward had an aggressive mindset when it took the floor Thursday at Belle Vernon for its Section 4-AAA finale.

That's what happens when a team gets a certifiable scare in its previous game.

Instead of taking things down to the wire like it did in an overtime win Monday against Ringgold or falling into a double-digit hole akin to the first meeting with Belle Vernon, Trib Total Media Class AAA No. 2 Elizabeth Forward (20-1, 12-0) built a 20-point halftime lead and cruised to a 51-38 victory over Belle Vernon (15-5, 9-3) to complete a season sweep of the Leopards.

“We haven't been sharp in our last couple of games, and we emphasized that we had to play better in order to advance as far as we want to advance,” Elizabeth Forward coach Sam Kosanovich said. “We told them that we want them playing their best basketball like they were playing in the championship game, and I think we did that. They were a lot sharper because they were more focused on what we were trying to accomplish.”

Elizabeth Forward likely will enter the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs as the No. 2 seed.

Considering how they fared in 2012 — the Warriors lost to eventual champion Hopewell in the quarterfinals and dropped a tough game against Hollidaysburg in the opening round of the state tournament — they certainly are hoping to have a longer run in the playoffs.

“We're definitely improved over last year, and (the question) whether or not the improvement is enough to carry us all the way through, only time will tell,” Kosanovich said. “I'm very proud of the way we've worked this season as a team.”

And it took a team effort just to contain the dominant inside play of senior forward Jessica Slagus, who scored a game-high 22 points, pulled in 16 rebounds and blocked two shots to almost singlehandedly keep Belle Vernon in the game.

“Jess has carried our offense all season for the most part,” Belle Vernon coach Lisa Fairman said. “We have a great team around her, but we couldn't drain some shots. We were just missing, and quite frankly, we had trouble with transition.”

Belle Vernon, which has locked up second place in the section and likely a top-eight seed in the playoffs, again acted out a theme to its season by committing 21 turnovers, including three in the final 1:46 of the second quarter that helped Elizabeth Forward close out the half on an 8-0 run.

“I think we just started off kind of cold offensively, and we struggled a little bit and couldn't get anything to fall,” Fairman said. “We didn't seem to be quite in sync.”

On the other side, Macy Pekula scored all nine of her points in the first half to help Elizabeth Forward jump out to a 35-15 halftime lead. Dana Buck led the team with 13, and Natalie Fekula scored 10 despite being on the bench in foul trouble for most of the game.

With Fekula limited, Olivia Barkley came off the bench and scored five of her seven points in the final 1:55 of the first quarter to help Elizabeth Forward open up a 17-6 advantage.

“We don't put emphasis on starters, and Olivia ... sometimes she comes off the bench and sometimes she starts, but whoever we bring off the bench, whether it's Barkley or (Abagail) Sporio or (Andrea) Paterra, they add a spark,” Kosanovich said. “We try to have more than one spark player, and they do a nice job of battling all the way.”

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KBarnes_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.