ShareThis Page

Aggressive attack bolsters Kittanning

| Saturday, Feb. 9, 2013, 12:21 a.m.
Kittanning's Sterling Henry goes up for a breakaway dunk during a 65-59 home win over Indiana on Friday, Feb. 8, 2013.
Kittanning's Kevin Barnes glides to the basket for a lay-up during a 65-59 home win over Indiana on Friday, Feb. 8, 2013.
Kittanning's Noah Kunst drives by Blake Shields (left) during a 65-59 home win over Indiana on Friday, Feb. 8, 2013.

No longer timid and no longer flooded with thoughts in their heads, stars and secondary contributors alike on Kittanning's boys basketball team attacked Indiana from all angles during a Section 1-AAA rematch Friday night.

Indiana, which set a slower pace when the teams met Jan. 15, succumbed to a more up-tempo, assertive Kittanning (17-4. 9-3), which won, 65-59, at home to move into a tie with the Little Indians (15-6, 9-3) for second place in Section 1-AAA.

“It was just seasoning for us,” Kittanning coach Bill Henry said. “I think the first time, over there, we played a little tight and didn't attack the zone. … We spent just about all day yesterday working on that.”

The Wildcats, who lost, 45-44, in the first meeting, scored as many points in the first quarter (16) Friday as they did in the first half of the January game. And that offensive success allowed them to take a lead in the second quarter that they never relinquished.

While Noah Kunst and Sterling Henry finished as the top scorers — 22 and 21 points, respectively — for Kittanning, they rarely needed to score to pick up the slack for others. The Wildcats showed early and often that they knew how to spread the shots around.

Vince Mead had a putback and another bucket in the paint during back-to-back possessions midway through the first quarter. He finished with six points.

Henry accumulated eight points by the end of the first quarter.

Kunst sank two 3-pointers and two floaters in the lane in a 3:00 span during the second quarter.

Kevin Barnes attacked the center lane for back-to-back layups midway through the third quarter. He had eight points.

And Mitch Pirhalla twice beat the Indiana defense by finding open space on the backside for easy buckets.

“Everybody had a little run there,” Bill Henry said. “Everybody took their turn stepping up.”

Sterling Henry needed just five more points to reach 1,000 for his career. But Kunst's hot hand limited Henry's scoring opportunities.

“I personally like playing against a zone because I know there are certain areas where, if you play it right, you get good looks,” Kunst said.

In part because of Kunst's second-quarter run, Kittanning went ahead by 10 with three minutes left in the half. But, in what became a trend during the game, Indiana fought its way back to heighten the drama.

A fast-break bucket by Kevin Jack cut Indiana's deficit to four points early in the third quarter.

Kittanning responded with a run that built a 44-32 lead. Then Indiana rallied, and two free throws by Riley Stapleton made it 49-45 just seconds into the fourth quarter.

A 3-pointer by Stapleton with 1:27 left in the game cut the Kittanning lead to 57-54. But the Little Indians never came closer. Stapleton finished with 11 points, while Jack had 10. Darrious Carter led the team with 17 points.

“No matter what defense we played, we weren't able to stop their dribble penetration,” Indiana coach Greg Lezanic said.

“One thing about this game was there was not one play we lost it on. We had many opportunities. … We just didn't take advantage of the opportunities.”

The game's tension helped prepare both teams for the postseason pressure that awaits next week.

Said Mead: “That was exactly like a playoff game for us.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.