ShareThis Page

Norwin's victory keeps Penn-Trafford out of postseason

| Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
(c) 2012 Lillian DeDomenic
Norwin's Nick Idele grabs a rebound in front of Penn-Trafford's Corey Stanford during the Knights' 66-61 win at home on Friday, Feb. 8, 2013. Lillian DeDomenic | For the Norwin Star
(c) 2012 Lillian DeDomenic
Dorian Stevens grabs a rebound for Penn-Trafford in the team's Section 1-AAAA finale at Norwin on Friday, Feb. 8, 2013. Lillian DeDomenic | For the Penn-Trafford Star
(c) 2012 Lillian DeDomenic
Corey Stanford elevates over a pair of Norwin players and his Penn-Trafford teammates to grab a rebound during the Warriors' 66-61 loss at Norwin on Friday, Feb. 8, 2013. Lillian DeDomenic | For the Penn-Trafford Star

Norwin's first win in six boys basketball meetings with Penn-Trafford might have been sweet for the Knights, but it was every bit as painful for the Warriors.

The Knights held off a third-quarter rally by their rivals and maintained a slim lead to the finish, as they closed the Section 1-AAAA season with a 66-61 win at home over P-T on Friday.

Curtis Perz led all scorers with 23 points, Matt Stewart scored 18, and Nick Idele had 17 for Norwin (12-9, 8-4), which clinched sole possession of third place after Latrobe lost to Hempfield on the same night.

“Just the fact that we're in the playoffs is the biggest thing. That's your first goal in any season,” Norwin coach Lynn Washowich said. “I don't know beating Penn-Trafford is as much of a big thing for us as getting into the playoffs is.”

Dorian Stevens scored 15 points, Andy Abreu had 14, and Corey Stanford put in 13 for Penn-Trafford (13-9, 6-6), which will miss the WPIAL Class AAAA playoffs after finishing fifth in the section.

“We knew there were five quality teams in our section, and you can't look past Connellsville, especially at their place,” Penn-Trafford coach Ryan Yarosik said.

“What it comes down to is that you have to take care of your home court and steal a few games on the road. We did well at home, but we only won on the road at Albert Gallatin, and that was the difference for us.”

Norwin pulled out to a 32-24 lead at half on the strength of its inside scoring, something it struggled to find in the first meeting between the teams this year, a 64-54 P-T win.

“We changed a couple of things about what we do, not just for against (P-T), but to make us better going into the playoffs,” Washowich said. “Everyone knows Stewart and Perz can score for us, but if we can get Idele scoring for us inside, it makes us a much better team.”

The Warriors closed the gap to one point, 44-43, by the end of the third quarter and appeared to have the momentum going their way, as they did in the fourth quarter of the first meeting.

Norwin responded to the challenge with two big hoops to start the last quarter, including a 3-pointer, as it kept Penn-Trafford from ever taking the lead in the second half.

“We pulled within one, and we felt if we got the lead, we'd be able to stretch it out,” Yarosik said. “But came out hit a big 3-pointer and got a defensive stop on the other end.

“Give Norwin a lot of credit. They played a very fundamentally sound game and stayed focused for four quarters. It was a hard-fought rivalry game, and it's not that we weren't focused, but at time our emotions got the best of us.”

Norwin held on for the win in yet another close game, as every contest it played against a team in the top five of the section was settled by 10 points or fewer. That experience in close games could help the Knights in a Quad-A tournament field that has a clear favorite in New Castle and plenty of parity after that.

“Quad-A basketball is a 32-minute game,” Washowich said. “You have to make every possession count, and these kids have a good idea of how to make everything count to win close games.”

While the consensus is that New Castle will be the No. 1 seed and Latrobe and Canon-McMillan — the two fourth-place teams with double-digit losses — will be the bottom two seeds, where the middle seeds fall for the Quad-A playoffs was anyone's guess prior to the pairings meeting.

The WPIAL playoff brackets were scheduled to be released on Tuesday night, after this edition's deadline. To see the full brackets, visit

“Third place does mean a little bit in the seeding, but I've been in this 15 years now, and just when you think you figure it out, the committee does something different,” Washowich said.

As for Penn-Trafford, the season ends with the disappointment of watching the playoffs from the outside, and for seven seniors, a Saturday nonsection loss to North Allegheny, 78-54, will go in the books at their final game.

But after winning a section title in 2012 and improving the team from a 5-16 record three years ago, the Warriors' coach said, his group of outgoing players should remember the successes during their four years.

“The toughest thing was addressing those seven seniors after the (Norwin) game. I told the kids, you try to take this as a life lesson, and the lesson is that there are no guarantees,” Yarosik said.

“We had a lot of great battles wtih Hempfield, some great rivalry games with Norwin and won a section title. These guys are going to walk out of here with a lot of good moments to remember.”

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.