ShareThis Page

Led by leading scorer in Class AAAA, Hempfield girls cruise into postseason

| Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2013, 11:30 p.m.
Hempfield's head coach Aaron Epps talks with his team prior to their tournament game against Greensburg Salem on Thursday, Dec. 27, 2012 at Hempfield High School. Steph Anderson | For the Tribune-Review
Hempfield's head coach Aaron Epps brings the team together for a pregame cheer prior to their tournament game against Greensburg Salem on Thursday, Dec. 27, 2012 at Hempfield High School. Steph Anderson | For the Tribune-Review

As Aaron Epps heads into his first postseason as coach of the Hempfield girls basketball team, he's identified an advantage he'll hold over any of his counterparts in the WPIAL Class AAAA bracket.

“I know most games I go into, I probably have the best player on the floor,” Epps said. “Any coach would love that.”

While the term “best” is subjective, one thing isn't: Epps will have the top season point-producer heading into every game. Junior guard Monica Burns averaged 18.4 points per contest during the regular season, the most of any WPIAL Class AAAA player.

“Monica, she's just a flat-out scorer,” Epps said. “There's really just nothing she can't do on offense. Her range is the NBA line, basically, and she's a great ball-handler and great off the drive, and now she's even improved on making the other girls better by getting some assists.

“Offensively, I've been very proud of Monica. She's probably one of the hardest girls to guard, especially in Quad-A, scoring-wise, because not only can she shoot it, she can drive it and then shoot 85 percent from the foul line. She's just very tough to cover.”

Burns' scoring prowess is central among the reasons Hempfield (19-3, 14-0) swept to the Section 1-AAAA title and earned the No. 4 seed in the WPIAL playoffs. The Spartans open the postseason against Upper St. Clair (11-11) at North Allegheny 6:30 p.m. Friday.

Before closing the regular season with a loss at North Allegheny on Saturday, Hempfield had won 12 straight games.

“We're happy with the way the season's going, and we definitely want to make it to the WPIAL finals,” said Burns, a 5-foot-7 shooting guard. “That's a big goal for us, and we're just going to keep working as hard as we can to make it there.”

That's the way a team leader talks. A multiyear starter, Burns is embracing that kind of role as a junior.

“Monica's not a vocal leader; she moreso leads by example,” Epps said. “She's a gym rat, for one thing. Monica would sleep in the gym if she could.

“She has that drive to be good and the drive to play at the highest level. She has one of the best work ethics of any player I've coached in basketball. She wants to be a good player and she wants to work as hard as she needs to to do it. It's paid off thus far. She's still got a long way to go and a lot to improve on, and she also understands that.”

Burns vows to work on her defensive game — a worthy pursuit that, Epps says, is all that stands between her and a Division I scholarship.

Hempfield has its share of strong defensive players around Burns, including senior forward Lea Scozio. Burns' sister, Mary, is the Spartans' senior starting point guard. Mary Burns is averaging eight points — and only two turnovers — per game.

“That's phenomenal as a point guard,” Epps said.

Sophomore forward Leah Knizner is Hempfield's second-leading scorer at about 10 points per game. Senior forward Casey Hamilton is the team's top rebounder at roughly six per contest.

At six points and six rebounds per game, 5-10 junior forward Jasmine Jones is the Spartans' top producer off the bench. Sophomore forward Lexi Irwin and freshman guard Aubree Halusic also are valuable reserves.

“We've got a lot of different girls challenging for spots in practice,” Monica Burns said. “We have a lot of team chemistry, and that will work well for us in the playoffs.”

Chris Adamski is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.