Franklin Regional's boys basketball team knocks off Plum
Given the way the last few weeks have gone, Franklin Regional's boys basketball team probably wishes the season had another month.
Franklin Regional capped off a strong end to the season with a Section 2-AAAA win over rival Plum, 54-50, which gave the Panthers four straight wins and wins in five of their last six games to close out the season.
Jake Roberge led Franklin Regional (12-10, 6-8) with 14 points, Charan Singh scored 12, George Brown had 11, and Tyler Hamilton had 10 for the Panthers against Plum (11-11, 6-8). FR put the win away in the fourth quarter by making 10 of 13 foul shots to hold a slim lead throughout.
“Having a young team, one of the things I talked about was that we needed our guys to improve throughout the season,” Franklin Regional coach Brad Midgley said.
“By beating a team that beat us the first time, it's good for the players to see something come out of that improvement.”
Two of FR's final three wins came against teams that it lost to previously — Plum and McKeesport.
“We started to treat each possession with more importance,” Midgley said. “In the start, we had trouble winning close games. We'd take a bad shot, or we wouldn't play defense on one possession, and the difference in a Quad-A game is usually three or four possessions.”
The strong finish bodes well for the Panthers in 2013-14, but they will go on without their two seniors from this year, Nate Hlozek and Joey Biondo.
“Those two guys have been with us for all four years,” Midgley said.
“They've had some ups and downs, but they fought through, never complained and helped lay the groundwork for what we hope to accomplish.”
Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.